+2016-10-13 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
+
+ PR bootstrap/77962
+ * function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Call all
+ make_*logue_seq in the same order as traditional. Call them
+ all a second time if shrink_wrapped_separate.
+
2016-10-13 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
* Makefile.in (insn-attrtab.o-warn, insn-dfatab.o-warn,
edge entry_edge = single_succ_edge (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
edge orig_entry_edge = entry_edge;
+ rtx_insn *split_prologue_seq = make_split_prologue_seq ();
rtx_insn *prologue_seq = make_prologue_seq ();
+ rtx_insn *epilogue_seq = make_epilogue_seq ();
/* Try to perform a kind of shrink-wrapping, making sure the
prologue/epilogue is emitted only around those parts of the
try_shrink_wrapping_separate (entry_edge->dest);
/* If that did anything for any component we now need the generate the
- "main" prologue again. If that does not work for some target then
- that target should not enable separate shrink-wrapping. */
+ "main" prologue again. Because some targets require some of these
+ to be called in a specific order (i386 requires the split prologue
+ to be first, for example), we create all three sequences again here.
+ If this does not work for some target, that target should not enable
+ separate shrink-wrapping. */
if (crtl->shrink_wrapped_separate)
- prologue_seq = make_prologue_seq ();
-
- rtx_insn *split_prologue_seq = make_split_prologue_seq ();
- rtx_insn *epilogue_seq = make_epilogue_seq ();
+ {
+ split_prologue_seq = make_split_prologue_seq ();
+ prologue_seq = make_prologue_seq ();
+ epilogue_seq = make_epilogue_seq ();
+ }
rtl_profile_for_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));