+2002-02-09 Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
+
+ * elf64-mmix.c (_bfd_mmix_finalize_linker_allocated_gregs): Check
+ that base-plus-offset reloc accounting is consistent.
+ (mmix_elf_relax_section): Keep base-plus-offset reloc accounting
+ up to date for undefined symbols.
+
2002-02-08 Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
From Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
if (contents == NULL)
return false;
+ /* Sanity check: If these numbers mismatch, some relocation has not been
+ accounted for and the rest of gregdata is probably inconsistent.
+ It's a bug, but it's more helpful to identify it than segfaulting
+ below. */
+ if (gregdata->n_remaining_bpo_relocs_this_relaxation_round
+ != gregdata->n_bpo_relocs)
+ {
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("Internal inconsistency: remaining %u != max %u.\n\
+ Please report this bug."),
+ gregdata->n_remaining_bpo_relocs_this_relaxation_round,
+ gregdata->n_bpo_relocs);
+ return false;
+ }
+
for (lastreg = 255, i = 0, j = 0; j < n_gregs; i++)
if (gregdata->reloc_request[i].regindex != lastreg)
{
struct bfd_link_info *link_info;
boolean *again;
{
-
Elf_Internal_Shdr *symtab_hdr;
Elf_Internal_Shdr *shndx_hdr;
Elf_Internal_Rela *internal_relocs;
if (h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_defined
&& h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_defweak)
{
- /* This appears to be a reference to an undefined
- symbol. Just ignore it--it will be caught by the
- regular reloc processing. */
+ /* This appears to be a reference to an undefined symbol.
+ Just ignore it--it will be caught by the regular reloc
+ processing. We need to keep BPO reloc accounting
+ consistent, though. */
+ gregdata->n_remaining_bpo_relocs_this_relaxation_round--;
+ bpono++;
continue;
}