(no commit message)

diff --git a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
index 04cdd857febfc32bf8078ede9e331c1ed98dadd3..1bd19264114661b6678247bb470326ddf2b569ca 100644 (file)
--- a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
+++ b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ RISC-V has RVV, ARM has SVE2, x86 has AVX512, whilst OpenPOWER has an out-of-dat
 
 https://www.sigarch.org/simd-instructions-considered-harmful/
 
-Normally, such huge ISA development efforts would be instigated, organised and funded through either Academia or an extremely large Corporation, or a Consortium combining multiple such entities.  It is therefore without precedent across the Computing Industry for something of this magnitude of effort to come not only from *individuals* with a completely independent non-affiliated Libre background but from a Libre background that is funded by a Charitable Foundation with a mandate to only fund "Works for the Public Good" (NLnet).
+Normally, such huge ISA development efforts would be instigated, organised and funded through either Academia or an extremely large Corporation, or a Consortium combining multiple such entities.  It is therefore without precedent across the Computing Industry for something of this magnitude of effort to come not only from *individuals* with a completely independent non-affiliated Libre background but from a Libre background that is funded by a Charitable Foundation with a mandate to exclusively fund "Works for the Public Good" (NLnet).
 
 From reading the PowerISA v3.0C sections we have learned and taken on board that a "Sandbox" opcode exists (EXT22) which is intended for "small private extensions" to the OpenPOWER ISA.  The expectation that these extensions not be supported by upstream tool-chains is something with which we wholeheartedly agree.