C++11 has a
static_assert (COND, MESSAGE)
which gives more readable error messages for STATIC_ASSERT than our
current implementation.
This patch makes us use it if __cplusplus >= 201103L
There's also a provisional static_assert (COND) in C++1z, but presumably
we should wait until that one is fully standardized before using it.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* system.h (STATIC_ASSERT): Use static_assert if building
with C++11 onwards.
From-SVN: r238786
+2016-07-27 David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
+
+ * system.h (STATIC_ASSERT): Use static_assert if building
+ with C++11 onwards.
+
2016-07-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/72517
#define STATIC_CONSTANT_P(X) (false && (X))
#endif
-/* Until we can use C++11's static_assert. */
+/* static_assert (COND, MESSAGE) is available in C++11 onwards. */
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+#define STATIC_ASSERT(X) \
+ static_assert ((X), #X)
+#else
#define STATIC_ASSERT(X) \
typedef int assertion1[(X) ? 1 : -1] ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED
+#endif
/* Provide a fake boolean type. We make no attempt to use the
C99 _Bool, as it may not be available in the bootstrap compiler,