+2003-04-10 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
+
+ * d10v-tdep.c (d10v_frame_this_id): Set the code addr to the
+ frame's function's address. Simplify.
+ (d10v_frame_unwind_cache): Check that the frame's function is
+ non-zero.
+
2003-04-10 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* s390-tdep.c (s390_gdbarch_init): Put back accidentally deleted
info->uses_frame = 0;
for (pc = frame_func_unwind (next_frame);
- pc < frame_pc_unwind (next_frame);
+ pc > 0 && pc < frame_pc_unwind (next_frame);
pc += 4)
{
op = (unsigned long) read_memory_integer (pc, 4);
struct d10v_unwind_cache *info
= d10v_frame_unwind_cache (next_frame, this_prologue_cache);
CORE_ADDR base;
- CORE_ADDR pc;
+ CORE_ADDR func;
+ struct frame_id id;
- /* The PC is easy. */
- pc = frame_pc_unwind (next_frame);
+ /* The FUNC is easy. */
+ func = frame_func_unwind (next_frame);
/* This is meant to halt the backtrace at "_start". Make sure we
don't halt it at a generic dummy frame. */
- if (pc == IMEM_START || pc <= IMEM_START || inside_entry_file (pc))
+ if (func <= IMEM_START || inside_entry_file (func))
return;
/* Hopefully the prologue analysis either correctly determined the
if (base == STACK_START || base == 0)
return;
+ id = frame_id_build (base, func);
+
/* Check that we're not going round in circles with the same frame
ID (but avoid applying the test to sentinel frames which do go
round in circles). Can't use frame_id_eq() as that doesn't yet
compare the frame's PC value. */
if (frame_relative_level (next_frame) >= 0
&& get_frame_type (next_frame) != DUMMY_FRAME
- && get_frame_pc (next_frame) == pc
- && get_frame_base (next_frame) == base)
+ && frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (next_frame), id))
return;
- (*this_id) = frame_id_build (base, pc);
+ (*this_id) = id;
}
static void