It's possible but unlikely that an indirect symbol points at a warning
symbol.
* elf64-ppc.c (add_symbol_adjust): Correct order of tests for
warning and indirect symbols.
+2016-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
+
+ * elf64-ppc.c (add_symbol_adjust): Correct order of tests for
+ warning and indirect symbols.
+
2016-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Don't copy dynamic
struct ppc_link_hash_table *htab;
struct ppc_link_hash_entry *fdh;
- if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect)
- return TRUE;
-
if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_warning)
eh = (struct ppc_link_hash_entry *) eh->elf.root.u.i.link;
+ if (eh->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect)
+ return TRUE;
+
if (eh->elf.root.root.string[0] != '.')
abort ();