simplify target_is_pushed

While working on target_is_pushed, I noticed that it is written in a
strange way.  The code currently keeps an extra indirection, where a
simple linked list traversal is all that is needed.  It seems likely
this was done by copying and pasting other code.  However, there is no
reason to do this and the more obvious code is simpler to reason
about.  So, this patch change the implementation.

2014-07-29  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>

	* target.c (target_is_pushed): Simplify.

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 10b38cd388beb617437fddb4fe486c4bbd8b3849..460547bdcceaa5f3aaca52b5bce70c468e25f150 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2014-07-29  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
+
+       * target.c (target_is_pushed): Simplify.
+
 2014-07-29  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
 
        GDB 7.8 released.

diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
index d9b471b1350e1379e26d30bbfd818b7b39b0a13f..46186bb019d62ab12d5e9aa164e6c14d648bd76d 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/target.c
+++ b/gdb/target.c
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ pop_all_targets (void)
 int
 target_is_pushed (struct target_ops *t)
 {
-  struct target_ops **cur;
+  struct target_ops *cur;
 
   /* Check magic number.  If wrong, it probably means someone changed
      the struct definition, but not all the places that initialize one.  */
@@ -684,8 +684,8 @@ target_is_pushed (struct target_ops *t)
                      _("failed internal consistency check"));
     }
 
-  for (cur = &target_stack; (*cur) != NULL; cur = &(*cur)->beneath)
-    if (*cur == t)
+  for (cur = target_stack; cur != NULL; cur = cur->beneath)
+    if (cur == t)
       return 1;
 
   return 0;