(no commit message)

diff --git a/openpower/sv/SimpleV_rationale.mdwn b/openpower/sv/SimpleV_rationale.mdwn
index 4d8f5a81702677be0c1e8a0c39eefb3240b89ed1..a6beeb2c5ee5b33ba1e58f662e64eea2502fe60a 100644 (file)
--- a/openpower/sv/SimpleV_rationale.mdwn
+++ b/openpower/sv/SimpleV_rationale.mdwn
@@ -552,9 +552,19 @@ The similarity to ZOLC should not have gone unnoticed: where ZOLC
 has nested conditional for-loops Extra-V appears to have just the
 one conditional for-loop, but the key strategically-crucial
 part of this multi-faceted puzzle is that due to the deterministic and
-coherent nature of Extra-V, the processing of the loops is not
-done close to the CPU it is
+coherent nature of Extra-V, the processing of the loops, which
+requires a tiny processor, is not
+done close to the CPU at all: it is
 *embedded right next to the memory*.
 
+The similarity to the D-Matrix Systolic Array Processing, Aspex Microelectronics
+Array-String Processing, and Elixent 2D Array Processing, should
+also not have gone unnoticed.  All of these solutions utilised
+or utilise
+a more comprehensive Turing-complete von-Neumann "Management Core"
+to coordinate data passed in and out of PEs: none of them had or
+had something
+as powerful as OpenCAPI as part of that picture.
+
 **Snitch**