The static_assert in the following test was failing on armv7hl because
we were disregarding the alignas specifier on Cell. BaseShape's data
takes up 20B on 32-bit architectures, but we failed to round up its
TYPE_SIZE. This happens since the
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01189.html>
patch: here, in layout_class_type for TenuredCell, we see that the size
of TenuredCell and its CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE match, so we set
CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE (t) = t;
While TYPE_USER_ALIGN of TenuredCell was 0, because finalize_type_size
called from finish_record_layout reset it, TYPE_USER_ALIGN of its
CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE still remained 1. After we replace it, it's no longer
1. Then we perform layout_empty_base_or_field for TenuredCell and since
TYPE_USER_ALIGN of its CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE is now 0, we don't do this
adjustment:
if (CLASSTYPE_USER_ALIGN (type))
{
rli->record_align = MAX (rli->record_align, CLASSTYPE_ALIGN (type));
if (warn_packed)
rli->unpacked_align = MAX (rli->unpacked_align, CLASSTYPE_ALIGN (type));
TYPE_USER_ALIGN (rli->t) = 1;
}
where rli->t is BaseShape. Then finalize_record_size won't use the
correct rli->record_align and therefore
/* Round the size up to be a multiple of the required alignment. */
TYPE_SIZE (rli->t) = round_up (unpadded_size, TYPE_ALIGN (rli->t));
after this we end up with the wrong size.
Since the original fix was to avoid creating extra copies for LTO
purposes, I think the following fix should be acceptable.
PR c++/94050 - ABI issue with alignas on armv7hl.
* class.c (layout_class_type): Don't replace a class's
CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE if their TYPE_USER_ALIGN don't match.
* g++.dg/abi/align3.C: New test.
+2020-03-09 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94050 - ABI issue with alignas on armv7hl.
+ * class.c (layout_class_type): Don't replace a class's
+ CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE if their TYPE_USER_ALIGN don't match.
+
2020-03-09 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
* coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Factor out code inserting the
/* If we didn't end up needing an as-base type, don't use it. */
if (CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE (t) != t
+ /* If T's CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE is TYPE_USER_ALIGN, but T is not,
+ replacing the as-base type would change CLASSTYPE_USER_ALIGN,
+ causing us to lose the user-specified alignment as in PR94050. */
+ && TYPE_USER_ALIGN (t) == TYPE_USER_ALIGN (CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE (t))
&& tree_int_cst_equal (TYPE_SIZE (t),
TYPE_SIZE (CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE (t))))
CLASSTYPE_AS_BASE (t) = t;
+2020-03-09 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94050 - ABI issue with alignas on armv7hl.
+ * g++.dg/abi/align3.C: New test.
+
2020-03-09 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
* gcc.target/arm/fuse-caller-save.c: Fix DejaGnu typo.
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/94050 - ABI issue with alignas on armv7hl.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct alignas(8) Cell {};
+struct TenuredCell : public Cell {};
+struct BaseShape : public TenuredCell {
+ void *p;
+ unsigned q, r;
+ void *s;
+ __UINTPTR_TYPE__ t;
+};
+static_assert (sizeof (BaseShape) % 8 == 0, "");