--- /dev/null
+/* Contributed by Nicola Pero <nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com>, May 2011. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "No API#2 pre-Darwin9" { *-*-darwin[5-8]* } { "-fnext-runtime" } { "" } } */
+
+#include <objc/runtime.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+int main(int argc, void **args)
+{
+#ifdef __GNU_LIBOBJC__
+ /* This special test tests that, if you have a selector already
+ registered in the runtime with full type information, you can use
+ sel_registerTypedName() to get it even if you specify the type
+ with incorrect argframe information. This is helpful as
+ selectors generated by the compiler (which have correct argframe
+ information) are usually registered before hand-written ones
+ (which often have incorrect argframe information, but need the
+ correct one).
+
+ Note that in this hand-written test, even the type information of
+ the first selector may be wrong (on this machine); but that's OK
+ as we'll never actually use the selectors. */
+ SEL selector1 = sel_registerTypedName ("testMethod", "i8@0:4");
+ SEL selector2 = sel_registerTypedName ("testMethod", "i8@8:8");
+
+ /* We compare the selectors using ==, not using sel_isEqual(). This
+ is because we are testing internals of the runtime and we know
+ that in the current implementation they should be identical if
+ the stuff is to work as expected. Don't do this at home. */
+ if (selector1 != selector2)
+ abort ();
+#endif
+
+ return 0;
+}
+2011-05-24 Nicola Pero <nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com>
+
+ PR libobjc/48177
+ * selector.c (__sel_register_typed_name): Use sel_types_match()
+ instead of strcmp() to compare selector types (Suggestion by
+ Richard Frith-Macdonald <rfm@gnu.org>).
+
2011-04-15 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
PR libobjc/32037