This test checks run-time relocation overflow with GOT relocation and
32-bit relocation against the same symbol.
PR ld/19719
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr19719.d: New file.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr19719.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run pr19719.
+2016-04-19 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR ld/19719
+ * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr19719.d: New file.
+ * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr19719.s: Likewise.
+ * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run pr19719.
+
2016-04-18 Matthew Fortune <matthew.fortune@imgtec.com>
* ld.texinfo: Document NOCROSSREFS_TO script command.
--- /dev/null
+#as: --64
+#ld: -pie -melf_x86_64
+#error: .*relocation R_X86_64_32 against undefined symbol `foo' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
--- /dev/null
+ .text
+ .globl _start
+ .type _start, @function
+_start:
+ movl foo_p(%rip), %eax
+ movq foo@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
+ ret
+ .size _start, .-_start
+ .globl foo_p
+ .data
+ .align 4
+ .type foo_p, @object
+ .weak foo
+ .size foo_p, 4
+foo_p:
+ .long foo
run_dump_test "pr19609-7d"
run_dump_test "pr19939a"
run_dump_test "pr19939b"
+run_dump_test "pr19719"
proc undefined_weak {cflags ldflags} {
set testname "Undefined weak symbol"