VAX: Remove EXTV/EXTZV/INSV instruction use from aligned case insns

The INSV machine instruction is the only computational operation in the
VAX ISA that keeps condition codes intact.  In preparation to MODE_CC
transition keep patterns apart then that make or do not make use of said
instruction.  For consistency update EXTV and EXTZV instruction uses
accordingly.  In expand SUBREGs will be presented as operands, so handle
that possibility in the insn condition.

This actually yields better code by avoiding EXTV/EXTZV instructions in
pseudo-aligned register cases previously resorting to those instructions:

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ ins8:
 	subl2 $4,%sp	# 21	[c=32]  addsi3
 	movl 4(%ap),%r0	# 2	[c=16]  movsi_2
 	movl 8(%ap),%r1	# 17	[c=16]  movsi_2
-	insv %r1,$8,$8,%r0	# 9	[c=4]  *insv_aligned
+	insv %r1,$8,$8,%r0	# 9	[c=4]  *insv_2
 	ret		# 25	[c=0]  return
 	.size	ins8, .-ins8
 	.align 1
@@ -60,12 +60,12 @@ ext8:
 .globl extz8
 	.type	extz8, @function
 extz8:
-	.word 0	# 19	[c=0]  procedure_entry_mask
-	subl2 $4,%sp	# 20	[c=32]  addsi3
+	.word 0	# 18	[c=0]  procedure_entry_mask
+	subl2 $4,%sp	# 19	[c=32]  addsi3
 	movl 4(%ap),%r0	# 2	[c=16]  movsi_2
-	extzv $8,$8,%r0,%r1	# 13	[c=60]  *extzv_aligned
-	movl %r1,%r0	# 18	[c=4]  movsi_2
-	ret		# 24	[c=0]  return
+	rotl $24,%r0,%r0	# 13	[c=60]  *extzv_non_const
+	movzbl %r0,%r0
+	ret		# 23	[c=0]  return
 	.size	extz8, .-extz8
 	.align 1
 .globl ins16
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ ins16:
 	subl2 $4,%sp	# 21	[c=32]  addsi3
 	movl 4(%ap),%r0	# 2	[c=16]  movsi_2
 	movl 8(%ap),%r1	# 17	[c=16]  movsi_2
-	insv %r1,$16,$16,%r0	# 9	[c=4]  *insv_aligned
+	insv %r1,$16,$16,%r0	# 9	[c=4]  *insv_2
 	ret		# 25	[c=0]  return
 	.size	ins16, .-ins16
 	.align 1
@@ -94,8 +94,9 @@ ext16:
 extz16:
 	.word 0	# 18	[c=0]  procedure_entry_mask
 	subl2 $4,%sp	# 19	[c=32]  addsi3
-	movl 4(%ap),%r1	# 2	[c=16]  movsi_2
-	extzv $16,$16,%r1,%r0	# 7	[c=60]  *extzv_aligned
+	movl 4(%ap),%r0	# 2	[c=16]  movsi_2
+	rotl $16,%r0,%r0	# 7	[c=60]  *extzv_non_const
+	movzwl %r0,%r0
 	movzwl %r0,%r0	# 13	[c=4]  zero_extendhisi2
 	ret		# 23	[c=0]  return
 	.size	extz16, .-extz16

demonstrated with this program:

typedef struct
{
  int f0:1;
  int f1:7;
  int f8:8;
  int f16:16;
} bit_t;

typedef struct
{
  unsigned int f0:1;
  unsigned int f1:7;
  unsigned int f8:8;
  unsigned int f16:16;
} ubit_t;

typedef union
{
  bit_t b;
  int i;
} bit_u;

typedef union
{
  ubit_t b;
  unsigned int i;
} ubit_u;

int
ins1 (bit_u x, int y)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x), "+r" (y));
  x.b.f1 = y;
  return x.i;
}

int
ext1 (bit_u x)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x));
  return x.b.f1;
}

unsigned int
extz1 (ubit_u x)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x));
  return x.b.f1;
}

int
ins8 (bit_u x, int y)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x), "+r" (y));
  x.b.f8 = y;
  return x.i;
}

int
ext8 (bit_u x)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x));
  return x.b.f8;
}

unsigned int
extz8 (ubit_u x)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x));
  return x.b.f8;
}

int
ins16 (bit_u x, int y)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x), "+r" (y));
  x.b.f16 = y;
  return x.i;
}

int
ext16 (bit_u x)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x));
  return x.b.f16;
}

unsigned int
extz16 (ubit_u x)
{
  asm volatile ("" : "+r" (x));
  return x.b.f16;
}

It also papers over a regression:

FAIL: gcc.dg/pr83623.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr83623.c (test for excess errors)

from an ICE like:

during RTL pass: final
.../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83623.c: In function 'foo':
.../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83623.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275
0x10a056e3 change_address_1
	.../gcc/emit-rtl.c:2275
0x10a0645f adjust_address_1(rtx_def*, machine_mode, poly_int<1u, long>, int, int, int, poly_int<1u, long>)
	.../gcc/emit-rtl.c:2409
0x11cb588f output_97
	.../gcc/config/vax/vax.md:808
0x10aafb2f get_insn_template(int, rtx_insn*)
	.../gcc/final.c:2070
0x10ab2b3f final_scan_insn_1
	.../gcc/final.c:3039
0x10ab313b final_scan_insn(rtx_insn*, _IO_FILE*, int, int, int*)
	.../gcc/final.c:3152
0x10aaf887 final_1
	.../gcc/final.c:2020
0x10ab703b rest_of_handle_final
	.../gcc/final.c:4658
0x10ab757b execute
	.../gcc/final.c:4736
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr83623.c (internal compiler error)

triggered by an RTL instruction like:

(insn 17 14 145 (set (reg:SI 1 %r1)
        (zero_extract:SI (mem/c:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("x") <var_decl 0x7ffff7f80120 x>) [1 x+0 S4 A128])
            (const_int 16 [0x10])
            (const_int 16 [0x10]))) ".../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83623.c":12:9 97 {*extzv_aligned}
     (nil))

(where the address cannot be adjusted by 2 for PIC code as requested
here as it would create an offset external symbol reference) otherwise
caused by the patterns modified here, addressed next.  This indicates
a further rework is warranted here, but at least problems at hand have
been fixed.

	gcc/
	* config/vax/vax.md (*insv_aligned, *extzv_aligned)
	(*extv_aligned): Reject register bit-field locations that are not
	aligned to the least significant bit; update output statement
	accordingly.

diff --git a/gcc/config/vax/vax.md b/gcc/config/vax/vax.md
index de90848a6005a0b9d55557e6510662afb750af9a..80f09d97727a291300b6f63ecdf1f1e8183d1df5 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/config/vax/vax.md
+++ b/gcc/config/vax/vax.md
@@ -754,8 +754,8 @@
 \f
 ;; Special cases of bit-field insns which we should
 ;; recognize in preference to the general case.
-;; These handle aligned 8-bit and 16-bit fields,
-;; which can usually be done with move instructions.
+;; These handle aligned 8-bit and 16-bit fields
+;; that can be done with move or convert instructions.
 
 (define_insn "*insv_aligned"
   [(set (zero_extract:SI (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "+ro")
@@ -766,19 +766,19 @@
    && INTVAL (operands[2]) % INTVAL (operands[1]) == 0
    && (!MEM_P (operands[0])
        || ! mode_dependent_address_p (XEXP (operands[0], 0),
-                                      MEM_ADDR_SPACE (operands[0])))"
+                                     MEM_ADDR_SPACE (operands[0])))
+   && (!(REG_P (operands[0])
+        || (SUBREG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (operands[0]))))
+       || INTVAL (operands[2]) == 0)"
   "*
 {
-  if (REG_P (operands[0]))
-    {
-      if (INTVAL (operands[2]) != 0)
-       return \"insv %3,%2,%1,%0\";
-    }
-  else
+  if (!REG_P (operands[0]))
     operands[0]
       = adjust_address (operands[0],
                        INTVAL (operands[1]) == 8 ? QImode : HImode,
                        INTVAL (operands[2]) / 8);
+  else
+    gcc_assert (INTVAL (operands[2]) == 0);
 
   CC_STATUS_INIT;
   if (INTVAL (operands[1]) == 8)
@@ -795,19 +795,19 @@
    && INTVAL (operands[3]) % INTVAL (operands[2]) == 0
    && (!MEM_P (operands[1])
        || ! mode_dependent_address_p (XEXP (operands[1], 0),
-                                     MEM_ADDR_SPACE (operands[1])))"
+                                     MEM_ADDR_SPACE (operands[1])))
+   && (!(REG_P (operands[1])
+        || (SUBREG_P (operands[1]) && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (operands[1]))))
+       || INTVAL (operands[3]) == 0)"
   "*
 {
-  if (REG_P (operands[1]))
-    {
-      if (INTVAL (operands[3]) != 0)
-       return \"extzv %3,%2,%1,%0\";
-    }
-  else
+  if (!REG_P (operands[1]))
     operands[1]
       = adjust_address (operands[1],
                        INTVAL (operands[2]) == 8 ? QImode : HImode,
                        INTVAL (operands[3]) / 8);
+  else
+    gcc_assert (INTVAL (operands[3]) == 0);
 
   if (INTVAL (operands[2]) == 8)
     return \"movzbl %1,%0\";
@@ -823,19 +823,19 @@
    && INTVAL (operands[3]) % INTVAL (operands[2]) == 0
    && (!MEM_P (operands[1])
        || ! mode_dependent_address_p (XEXP (operands[1], 0),
-                                     MEM_ADDR_SPACE (operands[1])))"
+                                     MEM_ADDR_SPACE (operands[1])))
+   && (!(REG_P (operands[1])
+        || (SUBREG_P (operands[1]) && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (operands[1]))))
+       || INTVAL (operands[3]) == 0)"
   "*
 {
-  if (REG_P (operands[1]))
-    {
-      if (INTVAL (operands[3]) != 0)
-       return \"extv %3,%2,%1,%0\";
-    }
-  else
+  if (!REG_P (operands[1]))
     operands[1]
       = adjust_address (operands[1],
                        INTVAL (operands[2]) == 8 ? QImode : HImode,
                        INTVAL (operands[3]) / 8);
+  else
+    gcc_assert (INTVAL (operands[3]) == 0);
 
   if (INTVAL (operands[2]) == 8)
     return \"cvtbl %1,%0\";