PR tree-optimization/84178 reports a couple of source files that ICE inside
ifcvt when compiled with -03 -fno-tree-forwprop (trunk and gcc 7).
Both cases involve problems with ifcvt's per-BB gimplified predicates.
Testcase 1 fails this assertion within release_bb_predicate during cleanup:
283 if (flag_checking)
284 for (gimple_stmt_iterator i = gsi_start (stmts);
285 !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
286 gcc_assert (! gimple_use_ops (gsi_stmt (i)));
The testcase contains a division in the loop, which leads to
if_convertible_loop_p returning false (due to gimple_could_trap_p being true
for the division). This happens *after* the per-BB gimplified predicates
have been created in predicate_bbs (loop).
Hence tree_if_conversion bails out to "cleanup", but the gimplified predicates
exist and make use of SSA names; for example this conjunction for two BB
conditions:
_4 = h4.1_112 != 0;
_175 = (signed char) _117;
_176 = _175 >= 0;
_174 = _4 & _176;
is using SSA names.
This assertion was added in r236498 (aka
c3deca2519d97c55876869c57cf11ae1e5c6cf8b):
2016-05-20 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* tree-if-conv.c (add_bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts): Use
gimple_seq_add_seq_without_update.
(release_bb_predicate): Assert we have no operands to free.
(if_convertible_loop_p_1): Calculate post dominators later.
Do not free BB predicates here.
(combine_blocks): Do not recompute BB predicates.
(version_loop_for_if_conversion): Save BB predicates around
loop versioning.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-cd.c: Adjust.
The following patch fixes this by adding a call to gimple_seq_discard
to release_bb_predicate. It also updates the assertion, so that
instead of asserting the stmts have no imm uses, instead assert that
they weren't added to a bb before discarding them (otherwise discarding
them would be a bug). We know this is the case because
insert_gimplified_predicates has:
/* Once the sequence is code generated, set it to NULL. */
set_bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts (bb, NULL);
but asserting it seems appropriate as a double-check.
The patch doesn't address the 2nd issue within PR tree-optimization/84178.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/84178
* tree-if-conv.c (release_bb_predicate): Remove the
the assertion that the stmts have NULL use_ops.
Discard the statements, asserting that they haven't
yet been added to a BB.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/84178
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr84178-1.c: New test.
From-SVN: r258363
+2018-03-08 David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/84178
+ * tree-if-conv.c (release_bb_predicate): Remove the
+ the assertion that the stmts have NULL use_ops.
+ Discard the statements, asserting that they haven't
+ yet been added to a BB.
+
2018-03-08 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/84746
+2018-03-08 David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/84178
+ * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr84178-1.c: New test.
+
2018-03-08 Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
* lib/target-supports.exp: Do not return zero from a ifunc
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-options "-fno-tree-forwprop" } */
+
+int zy, h4;
+
+void
+r8 (long int mu, int *jr, int *fi, short int dv)
+{
+ do
+ {
+ int tx;
+
+ tx = !!h4 ? (zy / h4) : 1;
+ mu = tx;
+ *jr = (((unsigned char) mu > (254 >> dv)) ? 0 : (unsigned char) tx) + *fi;
+ } while (*jr == 0);
+
+ r8 (mu, jr, fi, 1);
+}
set_bb_predicate (bb, boolean_true_node);
}
-/* Release the SSA_NAMEs associated with the predicate of basic block BB,
- but don't actually free it. */
+/* Release the SSA_NAMEs associated with the predicate of basic block BB. */
static inline void
release_bb_predicate (basic_block bb)
gimple_seq stmts = bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts (bb);
if (stmts)
{
+ /* Ensure that these stmts haven't yet been added to a bb. */
if (flag_checking)
for (gimple_stmt_iterator i = gsi_start (stmts);
!gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
- gcc_assert (! gimple_use_ops (gsi_stmt (i)));
+ gcc_assert (! gimple_bb (gsi_stmt (i)));
+ /* Discard them. */
+ gimple_seq_discard (stmts);
set_bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts (bb, NULL);
}
}