case RID_FUNCTION_NAME:
case RID_PRETTY_FUNCTION_NAME:
case RID_C99_FUNCTION_NAME:
+ {
+ non_integral_constant name;
+
/* The symbols __FUNCTION__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, and
- __func__ are the names of variables. */
- goto id_expression;
+ __func__ are the names of variables -- but they are
+ treated specially. Therefore, they are handled here,
+ rather than relying on the generic id-expression logic
+ below. Grammatically, these names are id-expressions.
+
+ Consume the token. */
+ token = cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
+
+ switch (token->keyword)
+ {
+ case RID_FUNCTION_NAME:
+ name = NIC_FUNC_NAME;
+ break;
+ case RID_PRETTY_FUNCTION_NAME:
+ name = NIC_PRETTY_FUNC;
+ break;
+ case RID_C99_FUNCTION_NAME:
+ name = NIC_C99_FUNC;
+ break;
+ default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+ }
+
+ if (cp_parser_non_integral_constant_expression (parser, name))
+ return error_mark_node;
+
+ /* Look up the name. */
+ return finish_fname (token->u.value);
+ }
case RID_VA_ARG:
{
bool optional_p)
{
cp_token *token;
- tree id;
/* Peek at the next token. */
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
{
case CPP_NAME:
{
+ tree id;
+
/* We don't know yet whether or not this will be a
template-id. */
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
}
case CPP_KEYWORD:
- switch (token->keyword)
+ if (token->keyword == RID_OPERATOR)
{
- case RID_OPERATOR:
+ tree id;
+
/* This could be a template-id, so we try that first. */
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
/* Try a template-id. */
}
return id;
-
- case RID_FUNCTION_NAME:
- case RID_PRETTY_FUNCTION_NAME:
- case RID_C99_FUNCTION_NAME:
- cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
- /* Don't try to declare this while tentatively parsing a function
- declarator, as cp_make_fname_decl will fail. */
- if (current_binding_level->kind != sk_function_parms)
- finish_fname (token->u.value);
- return token->u.value;
-
- default:
- break;
}
/* Fall through. */