When I read dwarf_decode_lines_1 comments today, it should be called
"special opcode" rather than "special operand", as said in DWARF spec.
It is obvious to me. I'll push it in if no comments in three days.
gdb:
2014-08-06 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* dwarf2read.c (dwarf_decode_lines_1): Replace "Special
operand" with "Special opcode" in comments.
+2014-08-06 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
+
+ * dwarf2read.c (dwarf_decode_lines_1): Replace "Special
+ operand" with "Special opcode" in comments.
+
2014-08-05 Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
* interps.c (initialize_interps): Remove prototype.
if (op_code >= lh->opcode_base)
{
- /* Special operand. */
+ /* Special opcode. */
+
adj_opcode = op_code - lh->opcode_base;
address += (((op_index + (adj_opcode / lh->line_range))
/ lh->maximum_ops_per_instruction)