+2017-08-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR target/81736
+ * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_finalize_stack_realign_flags): Renamed
+ to ...
+ (ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags): This. Also clear
+ frame_pointer_needed if -fno-omit-frame-pointer is used without
+ stack access.
+ (ix86_expand_prologue): Replace ix86_finalize_stack_realign_flags
+ with ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags.
+ (ix86_expand_epilogue): Likewise.
+ (ix86_expand_split_stack_prologue): Likewise.
+ * doc/invoke.texi: Add a note for -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
+
2017-08-10 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
PR c++/81355
return "";
}
-/* Finalize stack_realign_needed flag, which will guide prologue/epilogue
- to be generated in correct form. */
+/* Finalize stack_realign_needed and frame_pointer_needed flags, which
+ will guide prologue/epilogue to be generated in correct form. */
+
static void
-ix86_finalize_stack_realign_flags (void)
+ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags (void)
{
/* Check if stack realign is really needed after reload, and
stores result in cfun */
}
/* If the only reason for frame_pointer_needed is that we conservatively
- assumed stack realignment might be needed, but in the end nothing that
- needed the stack alignment had been spilled, clear frame_pointer_needed
- and say we don't need stack realignment. */
- if (stack_realign
+ assumed stack realignment might be needed or -fno-omit-frame-pointer
+ is used, but in the end nothing that needed the stack alignment had
+ been spilled nor stack access, clear frame_pointer_needed and say we
+ don't need stack realignment. */
+ if ((stack_realign || !flag_omit_frame_pointer)
&& frame_pointer_needed
&& crtl->is_leaf
- && flag_omit_frame_pointer
&& crtl->sp_is_unchanging
&& !ix86_current_function_calls_tls_descriptor
&& !crtl->accesses_prior_frames
if (ix86_function_naked (current_function_decl))
return;
- ix86_finalize_stack_realign_flags ();
+ ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags ();
/* DRAP should not coexist with stack_realign_fp */
gcc_assert (!(crtl->drap_reg && stack_realign_fp));
return;
}
- ix86_finalize_stack_realign_flags ();
+ ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags ();
frame = m->frame;
m->fs.sp_realigned = stack_realign_fp;
gcc_assert (flag_split_stack && reload_completed);
- ix86_finalize_stack_realign_flags ();
+ ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags ();
frame = cfun->machine->frame;
allocate = frame.stack_pointer_offset - INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET;
@option{-fomit-frame-pointer}. You can configure GCC with the
@option{--enable-frame-pointer} configure option to change the default.
+Note that @option{-fno-omit-frame-pointer} doesn't force a new stack
+frame for all functions if it isn't otherwise needed, and hence doesn't
+guarantee a new frame pointer for all functions.
+
Enabled at levels @option{-O}, @option{-O2}, @option{-O3}, @option{-Os}.
@item -foptimize-sibling-calls
+2017-08-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR target/81736
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-1.c: New test.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-2.c: Likewise.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-3.c: Likewise.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-4.c: Likewise.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-5.c: Likewise.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-6.c: Likewise.
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr81736-7.c: Likewise.
+
2017-08-10 Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-msum-short.c: Fix typo.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+extern int i;
+
+int
+foo (void)
+{
+ return i;
+}
+
+/* No need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "%\[re\]bp" } } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+int
+#ifndef __x86_64__
+__attribute__((regparm(3)))
+#endif
+foo (int i)
+{
+ return i;
+}
+
+/* No need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "%\[re\]bp" } } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ asm ("# " : : : "ebx");
+}
+
+/* Need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "%\[re\]bp" } } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+int
+foo (int i1, int i2, int i3, int i4, int i5, int i6, int i7)
+{
+ return i7;
+}
+
+/* Need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "%\[re\]bp" } } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mavx" } */
+
+typedef int v8si __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
+
+void
+#ifndef __x86_64__
+__attribute__((regparm(3)))
+#endif
+foo (v8si *out_start, v8si *out_end, v8si *regions)
+{
+ v8si base = regions[3];
+ *out_start = base;
+ *out_end = base;
+}
+
+/* No need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "%\[re\]bp" } } */
+/* Verify no dynamic realignment is performed. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "and\[^\n\r]*sp" } } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+struct foo
+{
+ int head;
+} a;
+
+int
+bar (void)
+{
+ return a.head != 0;
+}
+
+/* No need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "%\[re\]bp" } } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */
+
+extern int foo (void);
+
+int
+bar (void)
+{
+ return foo ();
+}
+
+/* No need to use a frame pointer. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "%\[re\]bp" } } */