+2018-04-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/85529
+ * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (optimize_range_tests_var_bound): Add FIRST_BB
+ argument. Don't call get_nonzero_bits if opcode is ERROR_MARK_NODE,
+ rhs2 def stmt's bb is dominated by first_bb and it isn't an obvious
+ zero extension or masking of the MSB bit.
+ (optimize_range_tests): Add FIRST_BB argument, pass it through
+ to optimize_range_tests_var_bound.
+ (maybe_optimize_range_tests, reassociate_bb): Adjust
+ optimize_range_tests callers.
+
2018-04-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
static bool
optimize_range_tests_var_bound (enum tree_code opcode, int first, int length,
vec<operand_entry *> *ops,
- struct range_entry *ranges)
+ struct range_entry *ranges,
+ basic_block first_bb)
{
int i;
bool any_changes = false;
if (idx == NULL)
continue;
+ /* maybe_optimize_range_tests allows statements without side-effects
+ in the basic blocks as long as they are consumed in the same bb.
+ Make sure rhs2's def stmt is not among them, otherwise we can't
+ use safely get_nonzero_bits on it. E.g. in:
+ # RANGE [-83, 1] NONZERO 173
+ # k_32 = PHI <k_47(13), k_12(9)>
+ ...
+ if (k_32 >= 0)
+ goto <bb 5>; [26.46%]
+ else
+ goto <bb 9>; [73.54%]
+
+ <bb 5> [local count: 140323371]:
+ # RANGE [0, 1] NONZERO 1
+ _5 = (int) k_32;
+ # RANGE [0, 4] NONZERO 4
+ _21 = _5 << 2;
+ # RANGE [0, 4] NONZERO 4
+ iftmp.0_44 = (char) _21;
+ if (k_32 < iftmp.0_44)
+ goto <bb 6>; [84.48%]
+ else
+ goto <bb 9>; [15.52%]
+ the ranges on _5/_21/iftmp.0_44 are flow sensitive, assume that
+ k_32 >= 0. If we'd optimize k_32 >= 0 to true and k_32 < iftmp.0_44
+ to (unsigned) k_32 < (unsigned) iftmp.0_44, then we would execute
+ those stmts even for negative k_32 and the value ranges would be no
+ longer guaranteed and so the optimization would be invalid. */
+ if (opcode == ERROR_MARK)
+ {
+ gimple *g = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (rhs2);
+ basic_block bb2 = gimple_bb (g);
+ if (bb2
+ && bb2 != first_bb
+ && dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb2, first_bb))
+ {
+ /* As an exception, handle a few common cases. */
+ if (gimple_assign_cast_p (g)
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (g)))
+ && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (g)))
+ && (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (rhs2))
+ > TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (g)))))
+ /* Zero-extension is always ok. */ ;
+ else if (is_gimple_assign (g)
+ && gimple_assign_rhs_code (g) == BIT_AND_EXPR
+ && TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs2 (g)) == INTEGER_CST
+ && !wi::neg_p (wi::to_wide (gimple_assign_rhs2 (g))))
+ /* Masking with INTEGER_CST with MSB clear is always ok
+ too. */ ;
+ else
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
wide_int nz = get_nonzero_bits (rhs2);
if (wi::neg_p (nz))
continue;
maybe_optimize_range_tests for inter-bb range optimization.
In that case if oe->op is NULL, oe->id is bb->index whose
GIMPLE_COND is && or ||ed into the test, and oe->rank says
- the actual opcode. */
+ the actual opcode.
+ FIRST_BB is the first basic block if OPCODE is ERROR_MARK. */
static bool
optimize_range_tests (enum tree_code opcode,
- vec<operand_entry *> *ops)
+ vec<operand_entry *> *ops, basic_block first_bb)
{
unsigned int length = ops->length (), i, j, first;
operand_entry *oe;
any_changes |= optimize_range_tests_cmp_bitwise (opcode, first, length,
ops, ranges);
any_changes |= optimize_range_tests_var_bound (opcode, first, length, ops,
- ranges);
+ ranges, first_bb);
if (any_changes && opcode != ERROR_MARK)
{
break;
}
if (ops.length () > 1)
- any_changes = optimize_range_tests (ERROR_MARK, &ops);
+ any_changes = optimize_range_tests (ERROR_MARK, &ops, first_bb);
if (any_changes)
{
unsigned int idx, max_idx = 0;
if (is_vector)
optimize_vec_cond_expr (rhs_code, &ops);
else
- optimize_range_tests (rhs_code, &ops);
+ optimize_range_tests (rhs_code, &ops, NULL);
}
if (rhs_code == MULT_EXPR && !is_vector)