combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS rtx type.

2015-05-07  Venkataramanan Kumar  <venkataramanan.kumar@amd.com>

        * combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS
        rtx type.

From-SVN: r222874

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index c294b014d62199a1d3fd647fa003c24be909dff1..50c430a75aa2f76dd1ec07b600185d6610f859ae 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2015-05-07  Venkataramanan Kumar  <venkataramanan.kumar@amd.com>
+
+       * combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS
+       rtx type.
+
 2015-05-07  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
 
        PR tree-optimization/66002

diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index c04146ae645a766a923d335c7c2d246cea9ee0fc..9e3eb030a637e1ff16d12ad28d7c7f97e5dd861e 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -7723,9 +7723,8 @@ extract_left_shift (rtx x, int count)
    We try, as much as possible, to re-use rtl expressions to save memory.
 
    IN_CODE says what kind of expression we are processing.  Normally, it is
-   SET.  In a memory address (inside a MEM, PLUS or minus, the latter two
-   being kludges), it is MEM.  When processing the arguments of a comparison
-   or a COMPARE against zero, it is COMPARE.  */
+   SET.  In a memory address it is MEM.  When processing the arguments of
+   a comparison or a COMPARE against zero, it is COMPARE.  */
 
 rtx
 make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code)
@@ -7745,8 +7744,6 @@ make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code)
      but once inside, go back to our default of SET.  */
 
   next_code = (code == MEM ? MEM
-              : ((code == PLUS || code == MINUS)
-                 && SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode)) ? MEM
               : ((code == COMPARE || COMPARISON_P (x))
                  && XEXP (x, 1) == const0_rtx) ? COMPARE
               : in_code == COMPARE ? SET : in_code);