nir/cf: Don't break outer-block successors in split_block_beginning().

Consider the following NIR:

   block block_0;
   /* succs: block_1 block_2 */
   if (...) {
      block block_1;
      ...
   } else {
      block block_2;
   }

Calling split_block_beginning() on block_1 would break block_0's
successors:  link_block() sets both successors of a block, so calling
link_block(block_0, new_block, NULL) would throw away the second
successor, leaving only /* succ: new_block */.  This is invalid: the
block before an if statement must have two successors.

Changing the call to link_block(pred, new_block, pred->successors[0])
would correctly leave both successors in place, but because unlink_block
may shift successor[1] to successor[0], it may not preserve the original
order.  NIR maintains a convention that successor[0] must point to the
"then" block, while successor[1] points to the "else" block, so we need
to take care to preserve this ordering.

This patch creates a new function that swaps out one successor for
another, preserving the ordering.  It then uses this to fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>

diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c b/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c
index 43e4e43aeded6f50b0ecc8066cac0d29c8015464..e2a151dafacc5b9cb57d7fab3c8c7f66748f66d9 100644 (file)
--- a/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c
+++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c
@@ -199,6 +199,23 @@ link_block_to_non_block(nir_block *block, nir_cf_node *node)
 
 }
 
+/**
+ * Replace a block's successor with a different one.
+ */
+static void
+replace_successor(nir_block *block, nir_block *old_succ, nir_block *new_succ)
+{
+   if (block->successors[0] == old_succ) {
+      block->successors[0] = new_succ;
+   } else {
+      assert(block->successors[1] == old_succ);
+      block->successors[1] = new_succ;
+   }
+
+   block_remove_pred(old_succ, block);
+   block_add_pred(new_succ, block);
+}
+
 /**
  * Takes a basic block and inserts a new empty basic block before it, making its
  * predecessors point to the new block. This essentially splits the block into
@@ -217,9 +234,7 @@ split_block_beginning(nir_block *block)
    struct set_entry *entry;
    set_foreach(block->predecessors, entry) {
       nir_block *pred = (nir_block *) entry->key;
-
-      unlink_blocks(pred, block);
-      link_blocks(pred, new_block, NULL);
+      replace_successor(pred, block, new_block);
    }
 
    /* Any phi nodes must stay part of the new block, or else their