intel: Remove check for kernel 2.6.29.

Now that we require 2.6.39, there's no need to also check for 2.6.29.
Calling drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs() without checking
should be safe, as it simply sets a flag.

This does remove the check for zero fences available, but that doesn't
seem worth checking.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c
index eb451ba546b0f0301643d06740324630b7311de3..58496e232c944613ec3f77f50b61fb8f2ead0eff 100644 (file)
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_screen.c
@@ -989,7 +989,6 @@ static bool
 intel_init_bufmgr(struct intel_screen *intelScreen)
 {
    __DRIscreen *spriv = intelScreen->driScrnPriv;
-   int num_fences = 0;
 
    intelScreen->no_hw = getenv("INTEL_NO_HW") != NULL;
 
@@ -1000,12 +999,6 @@ intel_init_bufmgr(struct intel_screen *intelScreen)
       return false;
    }
 
-   if (!intel_get_param(spriv, I915_PARAM_NUM_FENCES_AVAIL, &num_fences) ||
-       num_fences == 0) {
-      fprintf(stderr, "[%s: %u] Kernel 2.6.29 required.\n", __func__, __LINE__);
-      return false;
-   }
-
    drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_enable_fenced_relocs(intelScreen->bufmgr);
 
    if (!intel_get_boolean(spriv, I915_PARAM_HAS_RELAXED_DELTA)) {