If the libtool used by the package is 2.4 (i.e. with no patchlevel), we
end up with error messages like this one, seen when building ntp-4.2.8p3:
/bin/sh: line 0: test: 2.4: integer expression expected
That's because the current sed expression "[0-9].[0-9]." only deletes content
like "2.4.", so it leaves "2.4" (no patch level *and* no second period) intact,
resulting in an ltmain_patchlevel of "2.4", not empty, and not "0". Then the
shell line goes bad, because the built in shell test -gt operates on integers
only, and fails on floating point numbers (like "2.4").
Additionally, the existing sed lines are problematic in other ways, because the
current expression "[0-9].[0-9]" will match "234" as well as "2.4", as an unescaped
period matches any character, not just a period. Also, the lack of an asterisk
after the first character may be a problem in the future, if a two digit initial
number is used.
So, this patch changes the sed regex as follows:
* Match a string of digits when searching for a number. I.e. "[0-9]*"
* Match specifically a period in between two numbers. I.e. "\."
* When searching for a patch level, make the second period optional. I.e. "\.*"
Signed-off-by: Danomi Manchego <danomimanchego123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
@$(call MESSAGE,"Patching libtool")
$(Q)for i in `find $($(PKG)_SRCDIR) -name ltmain.sh`; do \
ltmain_version=`sed -n '/^[ ]*VERSION=/{s/^[ ]*VERSION=//;p;q;}' $$i | \
- sed -e 's/\([0-9].[0-9]*\).*/\1/' -e 's/\"//'`; \
+ sed -e 's/\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\).*/\1/' -e 's/\"//'`; \
ltmain_patchlevel=`sed -n '/^[ ]*VERSION=/{s/^[ ]*VERSION=//;p;q;}' $$i | \
- sed -e 's/\([0-9].[0-9].\)\([0-9]*\).*/\2/' -e 's/\"//'`; \
+ sed -e 's/\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.*\)\([0-9]*\).*/\2/' -e 's/\"//'`; \
if test $${ltmain_version} = '1.5'; then \
$(APPLY_PATCHES) $${i%/*} support/libtool buildroot-libtool-v1.5.patch; \
elif test $${ltmain_version} = "2.2"; then\