// We have a "fake context" for the substitution map (we don't need it
// to be context-dependent)
context::Context fakeContext;
- SubstitutionMap substitutions(&fakeContext);
+ SubstitutionMap substitutions(&fakeContext, /* substituteUnderQuantifiers = */ false);
for(size_t k = 0; k < m->getNumCommands(); ++k) {
const DeclareFunctionCommand* c = dynamic_cast<const DeclareFunctionCommand*>(m->getCommand(k));
Notice() << "SmtEngine::checkModel(): -- simplifies to " << n << endl;
TheoryId thy = Theory::theoryOf(n);
- if(thy == THEORY_QUANTIFIERS || thy == THEORY_REWRITERULES) {
+ if(thy == THEORY_REWRITERULES) {
// Note this "skip" is done here, rather than above. This is
// because (1) the quantifier could in principle simplify to false,
// which should be reported, and (2) checking for the quantifier
// above, before simplification, doesn't catch buried quantifiers
// anyway (those not at the top-level).
- Notice() << "SmtEngine::checkModel(): -- skipping quantified assertion"
+ Notice() << "SmtEngine::checkModel(): -- skipping rewrite-rules assertion"
<< endl;
continue;
}
Node TheoryModel::getModelValue(TNode n, bool hasBoundVars) const
{
if(n.getKind() == kind::EXISTS || n.getKind() == kind::FORALL) {
- CheckArgument(d_equalityEngine.hasTerm(n), n, "Cannot get the model value for a previously-unseen quantifier: %s", n.toString().c_str());
+ // We should have terms, thanks to TheoryQuantifiers::collectModelInfo().
+ // However, if the Decision Engine stops us early, there might be a
+ // quantifier that isn't assigned. In conjunction with miniscoping, this
+ // might lead to a perfectly good model. Think of
+ // ASSERT FORALL(x) : p OR x=5
+ // The p is pulled out by miniscoping, and set to TRUE by the decision
+ // engine, then the quantifier's value in the model doesn't matter, so the
+ // Decision Engine stops. So even though the top-level quantifier was
+ // asserted, it can't be checked directly: first, it doesn't "exist" in
+ // non-miniscoped form, and second, no quantifiers have been asserted, so
+ // none is in the model. We used to fail an assertion here, but that's
+ // no good. Instead, return the quantifier itself. If we're in
+ // checkModel(), and the quantifier actually matters, we'll get an
+ // assert-fail since the quantifier isn't a constant.
+ if(!d_equalityEngine.hasTerm(n)) {
+ return n;
+ }
} else {
if(n.getKind() == kind::LAMBDA) {
NodeManager* nm = NodeManager::currentNM();