[jit] check result_type in gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op
authorAndrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:33:58 +0000 (15:33 +0000)
committerAndrea Corallo <akrl@gcc.gnu.org>
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:33:58 +0000 (15:33 +0000)
2019-07-22  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>

* jit-recording.c (unary_op_reproducer_strings): Make it extern.
(binary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
* jit-recording.h (unary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
(binary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
* libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op): Check result_type to be a
numeric type.
* libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op): Improve error message.

2019-07-22  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>

* jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c:
New testcase.
* jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c:
Adjust error message.

From-SVN: r273700

gcc/jit/ChangeLog
gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c
gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c [new file with mode: 0644]

index 41cb60f1266498b99c946912e9e6648482f6a5c9..af3f6b70917f2929517a525e5789173e9f70213d 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2019-07-22  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
+
+       * jit-recording.c (unary_op_reproducer_strings): Make it extern.
+       (binary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
+       * jit-recording.h (unary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
+       (binary_op_reproducer_strings): Likewise.
+       * libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op): Check result_type to be a
+       numeric type.
+       * libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op): Improve error message.
+
 2019-07-04  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
 
        * libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op): Check result_type to be a
index 495ac7f1ae945c207307635926fbf69c51ffdc31..2f75395989c141e6f8243df916473c0b2ef67a56 100644 (file)
@@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ recording::unary_op::make_debug_string ()
                              m_a->get_debug_string ());
 }
 
-static const char * const unary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
+const char * const unary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
   "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_MINUS",
   "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_BITWISE_NEGATE",
   "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_LOGICAL_NEGATE",
@@ -4968,7 +4968,7 @@ recording::binary_op::make_debug_string ()
                              m_b->get_debug_string_parens (prec));
 }
 
-static const char * const binary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
+const char * const binary_op_reproducer_strings[] = {
   "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_PLUS",
   "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_MINUS",
   "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_MULT",
index 13ec7eabefab5d66b4e6634978d1e9b9989701e2..4bd346e0131d3ba78dd5bb26f9e1329017a6b19f 100644 (file)
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ namespace gcc {
 
 namespace jit {
 
+extern const char * const unary_op_reproducer_strings[];
+extern const char * const binary_op_reproducer_strings[];
+
 class result;
 class dump;
 class reproducer;
index 23e83e2e42c032d0742126d44151375499e1cf79..eec2f00c59ee1091c0618420d76796119dc61168 100644 (file)
@@ -1336,6 +1336,13 @@ gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
     "unrecognized value for enum gcc_jit_unary_op: %i",
     op);
   RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (result_type, ctxt, loc, "NULL result_type");
+  RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL_PRINTF3 (
+    result_type->is_numeric (), ctxt, loc,
+    "gcc_jit_unary_op %s with operand %s "
+    "has non-numeric result_type: %s",
+    gcc::jit::unary_op_reproducer_strings[op],
+    rvalue->get_debug_string (),
+    result_type->get_debug_string ());
   RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (rvalue, ctxt, loc, "NULL rvalue");
 
   return (gcc_jit_rvalue *)ctxt->new_unary_op (loc, op, result_type, rvalue);
@@ -1387,9 +1394,10 @@ gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
     b->get_type ()->get_debug_string ());
   RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL_PRINTF4 (
     result_type->is_numeric (), ctxt, loc,
-    "gcc_jit_binary_op %i with operands a: %s b: %s "
-    "has non numeric result_type: %s",
-    op, a->get_debug_string (), b->get_debug_string (),
+    "gcc_jit_binary_op %s with operands a: %s b: %s "
+    "has non-numeric result_type: %s",
+    gcc::jit::binary_op_reproducer_strings[op],
+    a->get_debug_string (), b->get_debug_string (),
     result_type->get_debug_string ());
 
   return (gcc_jit_rvalue *)ctxt->new_binary_op (loc, op, result_type, a, b);
index d005ca6f750860703b068ef09bf309c58b1ab92f..d45620e4817f45b2cdffe06b9cfee95a445d3ad1 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2019-07-22  Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
+
+       * jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c:
+       New testcase.
+       * jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op-bad-res-type.c:
+       Adjust error message.
+
 2019-07-22  Paul A. Clarke  <pc@us.ibm.com>
 
        * gcc.target/powerpc/sse4_1-check.h: New.
index abadc9f941a0b51830842f9de3346685d72633b8..fbbb2e704d3b5a9352a0ab2ce4f9725e7a8085f1 100644 (file)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
 
   /* Verify that the correct error message was emitted.         */
   CHECK_STRING_VALUE (gcc_jit_context_get_first_error (ctxt),
-                     "gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op: gcc_jit_binary_op 1 with"
-                     " operands a: (int)1 b: (int)2 has non numeric "
-                     "result_type: void *");
+                     "gcc_jit_context_new_binary_op: gcc_jit_binary_op "
+                     "GCC_JIT_BINARY_OP_MINUS with operands a: "
+                     "(int)1 b: (int)2 has non-numeric result_type: void *");
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op-bad-res-type.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..fae722a
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include "libgccjit.h"
+
+#include "harness.h"
+
+/* Try to create an unary operator with invalid result type.  */
+
+void
+create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
+{
+  gcc_jit_type *int_type =
+    gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT);
+  gcc_jit_type *void_ptr_type =
+    gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_VOID_PTR);
+
+  gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op (
+    ctxt,
+    NULL,
+    GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_LOGICAL_NEGATE,
+    void_ptr_type,
+    gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_int (ctxt,
+                                        int_type,
+                                        1));
+}
+
+void
+verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
+{
+  CHECK_VALUE (result, NULL);
+
+  /* Verify that the correct error message was emitted.         */
+  CHECK_STRING_VALUE (gcc_jit_context_get_first_error (ctxt),
+                     "gcc_jit_context_new_unary_op: gcc_jit_unary_op "
+                     "GCC_JIT_UNARY_OP_LOGICAL_NEGATE with operand "
+                     "(int)1 has non-numeric result_type: void *");
+}