As seen in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24069 this
code will typically wait4() a second time on the same process that was
already wait4()'d a few lines above. While this used to be
harmless/idempotent (when we assumed that the process already exited),
this now causes a deadlock in the WIFSTOPPED case.
The early (~2019) history of bug #24069 cautiously suggests to use
WNOHANG instead of outright deleting the call. However, tests on the
current version of Darwin (Big Sur) demonstrate that gdb runs just fine
without a redundant call to wait4(), as would be expected.
Notwithstanding the debatable value of conserving bug compatibility with
an OS release that is more than a decade old, there is scant evidence of
what that double-wait4() was supposed to achieve in the first place - A
cursory investigation with `git blame` pinpoints commits
bb00b29d7802
and
a80b95ba67e2 from the 2008-2009 era, but fails to answer the
"why" question conclusively.
Co-Authored-By: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Id4e4415d66d6ff6b3552b60d761693f17015e4a0
inferior_debug (4, _("darwin_wait: pid=%d exit, status=0x%x\n"),
res_pid, wstatus);
- /* Looks necessary on Leopard and harmless... */
- wait4 (inf->pid, &wstatus, 0, NULL);
-
return ptid_t (inf->pid);
}
else