extend.texi (Compound Literals): Add '@' missed in last commit.

gcc/ChangeLog:
	* doc/extend.texi (Compound Literals): Add '@' missed in last commit.

From-SVN: r238652

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index deeaac15b5289d470235f8bd9d0db63c9c0c40aa..45554aebae626853b2ea6bd1f90deb370b465c67 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-07-22 Martin Sebor  <msebor@redhat.com>
+
+       * doc/extend.texi (Compound Literals): Add '@' missed in last commit.
+
 2016-07-22 Martin Sebor  <msebor@redhat.com>
 
        PR c/71560

diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 5c822657cfbb3e3faf007c26a3333f4fa45a54d0..ad8898c44853fbdc4cd5eaa4292beba73f90777e 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -1956,7 +1956,7 @@ because the lifetime of the array ends after the declaration of @code{foo}.
 As an optimization, G++ sometimes gives array compound literals longer
 lifetimes: when the array either appears outside a function or has
 a @code{const}-qualified type.  If @code{foo} and its initializer had
-elements of type @code{char *const} rather than code{char *}, or if
+elements of type @code{char *const} rather than @code{char *}, or if
 @code{foo} were a global variable, the array would have static storage
 duration.  But it is probably safest just to avoid the use of array
 compound literals in C++ code.