c-common.c (pointer_int_sum): Do not complain about using pointers to pointers-to...
authorMark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:35:01 +0000 (01:35 +0000)
committerMark Mitchell <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:35:01 +0000 (01:35 +0000)
* c-common.c (pointer_int_sum): Do not complain about using
pointers to pointers-to-members.

* call.c (build_conditional_expr): Do not call force_rvalue for
operands of void_type when the conditional expression itself has
void type.
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl): Don't consider a declaration of a
function named "main" to be an overload of a type named "main".
* parser.c (cp_parser_template_name): Perform name lookup when the
template name is proceeded by "template" if the qualifying scope
is non-dependent.
* typeck.c (composite_pointer_type_r): Correctly handle
pointer-to-member types.
(build_const_cast): Likewise.

* g++.dg/expr/cond5.C: New test.
* g++.dg/expr/constcast1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/expr/ptrmem2.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/expr/ptrmem3.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lookup/main1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/lookup6.C: Likewise.

From-SVN: r79663

gcc/ChangeLog
gcc/c-common.c
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
gcc/cp/call.c
gcc/cp/name-lookup.c
gcc/cp/parser.c
gcc/cp/typeck.c
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/main1.C [new file with mode: 0644]
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/lookup6.C [new file with mode: 0644]

index d118f05ba5b8c5f456436d629fae3e87070559bc..c33d57b545747aa2b54656de13174755376441f0 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2004-03-18  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * c-common.c (pointer_int_sum): Do not complain about using
+       pointers to pointers-to-members.
+
 2004-03-18  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
 
        * system.h (MD_ASM_CLOBBERS): Move to "Old target macros that
index 057ebeeeaf5e838506748bd5b11c236bd057366e..49c9ccf613cd31c4f5728b5f03667a6ced411bb8 100644 (file)
@@ -2484,12 +2484,6 @@ pointer_int_sum (enum tree_code resultcode, tree ptrop, tree intop)
        pedwarn ("pointer to member function used in arithmetic");
       size_exp = integer_one_node;
     }
-  else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (result_type)) == OFFSET_TYPE)
-    {
-      if (pedantic || warn_pointer_arith)
-       pedwarn ("pointer to a member used in arithmetic");
-      size_exp = integer_one_node;
-    }
   else
     size_exp = size_in_bytes (TREE_TYPE (result_type));
 
index 00e506659b5f9eda9857337ddf2189cad253f4e0..1052abed8af927bb8e93fefeb42b0416f8649d44 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+2004-03-18  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * call.c (build_conditional_expr): Do not call force_rvalue for
+       operands of void_type when the conditional expression itself has
+       void type.
+       * name-lookup.c (pushdecl): Don't consider a declaration of a
+       function named "main" to be an overload of a type named "main".
+       * parser.c (cp_parser_template_name): Perform name lookup when the
+       template name is proceeded by "template" if the qualifying scope
+       is non-dependent.
+       * typeck.c (composite_pointer_type_r): Correctly handle
+       pointer-to-member types.
+       (build_const_cast): Likewise.
+
 2004-03-18  Richard Kenner  <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
 
        * cp-tree.def (TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM, TYPEOF_TYPE): Update comments.
index 62182f3950ceee74737a90497a78dc42def09103..7a3039bd3b81c8e1ae3d9807c30cb79d98edced8 100644 (file)
@@ -3178,18 +3178,24 @@ build_conditional_expr (tree arg1, tree arg2, tree arg3)
           type of the other and is an rvalue.
 
         --Both the second and the third operands have type void; the
-          result is of type void and is an rvalue.  */
+          result is of type void and is an rvalue.  
+
+         We must avoid calling force_rvalue for expressions of type
+        "void" because it will complain that their value is being
+        used.   */
       if (TREE_CODE (arg2) == THROW_EXPR 
          && TREE_CODE (arg3) != THROW_EXPR)
        {
-         arg3 = force_rvalue (arg3);
+         if (!VOID_TYPE_P (arg3_type))
+           arg3 = force_rvalue (arg3);
          arg3_type = TREE_TYPE (arg3);
          result_type = arg3_type;
        }
       else if (TREE_CODE (arg2) != THROW_EXPR 
               && TREE_CODE (arg3) == THROW_EXPR)
        {
-         arg2 = force_rvalue (arg2);
+         if (!VOID_TYPE_P (arg2_type))
+           arg2 = force_rvalue (arg2);
          arg2_type = TREE_TYPE (arg2);
          result_type = arg2_type;
        }
index ce101de168c4ffe559d9c7812988a355bf1da9ce..15896821282d28f4484bb47ac4743dae59453ee7 100644 (file)
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ pushdecl (tree x)
 
                  POP_TIMEVAR_AND_RETURN (TV_NAME_LOOKUP, t);
                }
-             else if (DECL_MAIN_P (x))
+             else if (DECL_MAIN_P (x) && TREE_CODE (t) == FUNCTION_DECL)
                {
                  /* A redeclaration of main, but not a duplicate of the
                     previous one.
index db4025251f4d779874ba8cc6ad227c3901eb861a..0dc63cd8d27885d2cfd3278933a0212453fc586a 100644 (file)
@@ -8203,7 +8203,15 @@ cp_parser_template_name (cp_parser* parser,
            *is_identifier = true;
          return identifier;
        }
-      if (template_keyword_p)
+
+      /* If the "template" keyword is present, then there is generally
+        no point in doing name-lookup, so we just return IDENTIFIER.
+        But, if the qualifying scope is non-dependent then we can
+        (and must) do name-lookup normally.  */
+      if (template_keyword_p
+         && (!parser->scope
+             || (TYPE_P (parser->scope) 
+                 && dependent_type_p (parser->scope))))
        return identifier;
     }
 
index 10103c8aecbb6591abc72015412988afd9e0fb7d..e353d3f57aca545d1f001a3ea79c56790b6efdb4 100644 (file)
@@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ composite_pointer_type_r (tree t1, tree t2, const char* location)
   result_type = cp_build_qualified_type (result_type,
                                         (cp_type_quals (pointee1)
                                          | cp_type_quals (pointee2)));
-  result_type = build_pointer_type (result_type);
   /* If the original types were pointers to members, so is the
      result.  */
   if (TYPE_PTR_TO_MEMBER_P (t1))
@@ -456,6 +455,8 @@ composite_pointer_type_r (tree t1, tree t2, const char* location)
       result_type = build_ptrmem_type (TYPE_PTRMEM_CLASS_TYPE (t1),
                                       result_type);
     }
+  else
+    result_type = build_pointer_type (result_type);
 
   /* Merge the attributes.  */
   attributes = (*targetm.merge_type_attributes) (t1, t2);
@@ -4726,7 +4727,7 @@ build_const_cast (tree type, tree expr)
       return t;
     }
 
-  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
+  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_PTRMEM_P (type))
     error ("invalid use of const_cast with type `%T', which is not a pointer, reference, nor a pointer-to-data-member type", type);
   else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (type)) == FUNCTION_TYPE)
     {
index b7ff475b02da9ba271b8db4fdc87a4fbd2b573fe..be760c89c87ca21d3bd9c54c9dba2ef79f65b37c 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2004-03-18  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * g++.dg/expr/cond5.C: New test.
+       * g++.dg/expr/constcast1.C: Likewise.
+       * g++.dg/expr/ptrmem2.C: Likewise.
+       * g++.dg/expr/ptrmem3.C: Likewise.
+       * g++.dg/lookup/main1.C: Likewise.
+       * g++.dg/template/lookup6.C: Likewise.
+
 2004-03-18  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
        * gcc.dg/local1.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/main1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/main1.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1de8342
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+struct main {};
+
+int main () {}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/lookup6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/lookup6.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2ca6dcc
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+struct S
+{
+  template<typename T> static void g();
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+void f() { return S::template g<T>(); }
+
+void g() {
+  f<int>();
+}