+2003-11-26 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
+ Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ * readelf.c: Add a comment describing the difference between
+ readelf and objdump.
+ * doc/binutils.texi (readelf): Likewise.
+
2003-11-25 Danny Smith <dannysmith@users.sourceforge.net>
* doc/binutils.texi (dlltool): Document dlltool --temp-prefix
@var{elffile}@dots{} are the object files to be examined. 32-bit and
64-bit ELF files are supported, as are archives containing ELF files.
+This program performs a similar function to @command{objdump} but it
+goes into more detail and it exists independently of the @sc{bfd}
+library, so if there is a bug in @sc{bfd} then readelf will not be
+affected.
+
@c man end
@c man begin OPTIONS readelf
Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
02111-1307, USA. */
\f
-
+/* The difference between readelf and objdump:
+
+ Both programs are capabale of displaying the contents of ELF format files,
+ so why does the binutils project have two file dumpers ?
+
+ The reason is that objdump sees an ELF file through a BFD filter of the
+ world; if BFD has a bug where, say, it disagrees about a machine constant
+ in e_flags, then the odds are good that it will remain internally
+ consistent. The linker sees it the BFD way, objdump sees it the BFD way,
+ GAS sees it the BFD way. There was need for a tool to go find out what
+ the file actually says.
+
+ This is why the readelf program does not link against the BFD library - it
+ exists as an independent program to help verify the correct working of BFD.
+
+ There is also the case that readelf can provide more information about an
+ ELF file than is provided by objdump. In particular it can display DWARF
+ debugging information which (at the moment) objdump cannot. */
+\f
#include <assert.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>