+2004-08-18 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
+
+ PR 338
+ * elflink.c (bfd_elf_record_link_assignment): Add comment about
+ changing bfd_link_hash_undefined to bfd_link_hash_new.
+
2004-08-17 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* elfxx-target.h (bfd_elfNN_get_synthetic_symtab): Only define
/* Since we're defining the symbol, don't let it seem to have not
been defined. record_dynamic_symbol and size_dynamic_sections
- may depend on this. */
+ may depend on this.
+ ??? Changing bfd_link_hash_undefined to bfd_link_hash_new (or
+ to bfd_link_hash_undefweak, see linker.c:link_action) runs the risk
+ of some later symbol manipulation setting the symbol back to
+ bfd_link_hash_undefined, and the linker trying to add the symbol to
+ the undefs list twice. */
if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak
|| h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined)
h->root.type = bfd_link_hash_new;
+2004-08-18 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
+
+ PR 338
+ * ldexp.c (fold_name): Don't call bfd_link_add_undef if the symbol
+ was already on the undefs list.
+
2004-08-17 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* emultempl/ppc64elf.em (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_new_vers_pattern): Dot
{
h->type = bfd_link_hash_undefined;
h->u.undef.abfd = NULL;
- bfd_link_add_undef (link_info.hash, h);
+ if (h->und_next == NULL)
+ bfd_link_add_undef (link_info.hash, h);
}
}
break;