[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp for big endian

On s390x-linux, I run into:
...
(gdb) python print(u[u_fields[0]])^M
99^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: u's first field via field
python print(u[u_fields[1]])^M
0 '\000'^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: u's second field via field
...

There's a var u of this type:
...
union U {
  int a;
  char c;
};
...
and after assigning 99 to u.a, the test-case expects u.c to contain 99 (which
it does on x86_64), but instead it contains 0.

Fix this by instead assigning 0x63636363, to ensure that u.c == 99 for both
little and big endian.

Tested on x86_64-linux and s390x-linux.

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc
index 817b089c35f27754f4e72d29762e2cd465760ed9..d82e385d6c5bb6939f92830d21f967b678db6a60 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ func (const A &a)
   Btd &b_td = b1;
 
   U u;
-  u.a = 99;
+  u.a = 0x63636363;
 
   X x;
   x.x = 101;

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp
index 1ea10ad0058faf58082f5007c23cb3ea9bb1f5ca..b6571cd8297fb2fab9f21da33b771f5167e69a4b 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ gdb_test "python print(b_td\[b_fields\[0\]\].type.target())" "A" \
 gdb_test "python print(b_td\[b_fields\[0\]\]\['a'\])" "100" \
   "b_td.A::a via field"
 
-gdb_test "python print(u\[u_fields\[0\]\])" "99.*" "u's first field via field"
+gdb_test "python print(hex(u\[u_fields\[0\]\]))" "0x63636363.*" \
+    "u's first field via field"
 gdb_test "python print(u\[u_fields\[1\]\])" "99.*" "u's second field via field"
 
 gdb_test "python print(len(x_fields))" "2" "number for fields in u"