+2008-07-18 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
+
+ * symtab.cc (Symbol_table::add_from_object): Rewrite the case
+ where we see NAME/NULL and NAME/VERSION as separate symbols.
+ * testsuite/ver_test_main.cc (main): Call t4.
+ (t4, t4_2a): Define.
+ * testsuite/ver_test_2.cc (t4_2): Define.
+ * testsuite/ver_test_2.script: Put t4_2a in VER2.
+ * testsuite/ver_test_4.cc (t4_2a): Define.
+ * testsuite/ver_test_4.script: Put t4_2a in VER2.
+ * testsuite/ver_test.h (t4, t4_2, t4_2a): Declare.
+
2008-07-17 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
* dynobj.cc (Versions::add_def): If we give an error about a
// NAME/NULL point to NAME/VERSION.
insdef.first->second = ret;
}
- else if (insdef.first->second != ret
- && insdef.first->second->is_undefined())
+ else if (insdef.first->second != ret)
{
// This is the unfortunate case where we already have
- // entries for both NAME/VERSION and NAME/NULL. Note
- // that we don't want to combine them if the existing
- // symbol is going to override the new one. FIXME: We
- // currently just test is_undefined, but this may not do
- // the right thing if the existing symbol is from a
- // shared library and the new one is from a regular
- // object.
-
- const Sized_symbol<size>* sym2;
- sym2 = this->get_sized_symbol<size>(insdef.first->second);
- Symbol_table::resolve<size, big_endian>(ret, sym2, version);
- this->make_forwarder(insdef.first->second, ret);
- insdef.first->second = ret;
+ // entries for both NAME/VERSION and NAME/NULL. We now
+ // see a symbol NAME/VERSION where VERSION is the
+ // default version. We have already resolved this new
+ // symbol with the existing NAME/VERSION symbol.
+
+ // It's possible that NAME/NULL and NAME/VERSION are
+ // both defined in regular objects. This can only
+ // happen if one object file defines foo and another
+ // defines foo@@ver. This is somewhat obscure, but we
+ // call it a multiple definition error.
+
+ // It's possible that NAME/NULL actually has a version,
+ // in which case it won't be the same as VERSION. This
+ // happens with ver_test_7.so in the testsuite for the
+ // symbol t2_2. We see t2_2@@VER2, so we define both
+ // t2_2/VER2 and t2_2/NULL. We then see an unadorned
+ // t2_2 in an object file and give it version VER1 from
+ // the version script. This looks like a default
+ // definition for VER1, so it looks like we should merge
+ // t2_2/NULL with t2_2/VER1. That doesn't make sense,
+ // but it's not obvious that this is an error, either.
+ // So we just punt.
+
+ // If one of the symbols has non-default visibility, and
+ // the other is defined in a shared object, then they
+ // are different symbols.
+
+ // Otherwise, we just resolve the symbols as though they
+ // were the same.
+
+ if (insdef.first->second->version() != NULL)
+ {
+ gold_assert(insdef.first->second->version() != version);
+ def = false;
+ }
+ else if (ret->visibility() != elfcpp::STV_DEFAULT
+ && insdef.first->second->is_from_dynobj())
+ def = false;
+ else if (insdef.first->second->visibility() != elfcpp::STV_DEFAULT
+ && ret->is_from_dynobj())
+ def = false;
+ else
+ {
+ const Sized_symbol<size>* sym2;
+ sym2 = this->get_sized_symbol<size>(insdef.first->second);
+ Symbol_table::resolve<size, big_endian>(ret, sym2, version);
+ this->make_forwarder(insdef.first->second, ret);
+ insdef.first->second = ret;
+ }
}
else
def = false;