When adding the call to gen_vec_duplicate, I failed to notice that
code further down modified the VEC_DUPLICATE in place. That isn't
safe if gen_vec_duplicate returned a const_vector.
2017-11-02 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
gcc/
PR target/82809
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_vector_duplicate_value): Use
gen_vec_duplicate after forcing the scalar into a register.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr82809.c: New test.
From-SVN: r254366
+2017-11-03 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
+
+ PR target/82809
+ * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_vector_duplicate_value): Use
+ gen_vec_duplicate after forcing the scalar into a register.
+
2017-11-02 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
* combine (try_combine): Print the insns input to try_combine to the
reg = force_reg (innermode, val);
if (GET_MODE (reg) != innermode)
reg = gen_lowpart (innermode, reg);
- XEXP (dup, 0) = reg;
+ SET_SRC (PATTERN (insn)) = gen_vec_duplicate (mode, reg);
seq = get_insns ();
end_sequence ();
if (seq)
+2017-11-03 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
+
+ * gcc.dg/pr82809.c: New test.
+
2017-11-02 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
PR c++/81957
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Ofast -fno-tree-dominator-opts" } */
+
+struct locale_time_t
+{
+ const char *abday[7];
+ const unsigned int *wabday[7];
+};
+
+static const unsigned int empty_wstr[1] = { 0 };
+
+void
+time_read (struct locale_time_t *time)
+{
+ int cnt;
+
+ for (cnt=0; cnt < 7; cnt++)
+ {
+ time->abday[cnt] = "";
+ time->wabday[cnt] = empty_wstr;
+ }
+}