2003-11-22 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
authorAndrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:48:30 +0000 (15:48 +0000)
committerAndrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:48:30 +0000 (15:48 +0000)
* remote-rdp.c: Update copyright.
(rdp_init): #if 0 references to "target_byte_order".

gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/remote-rdp.c

index ab0834d613f41de0ef97c57361a571671c95d458..768756cc8f8bb7c98e0cf8ccbda5fbac941ba6b7 100644 (file)
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 2003-11-22  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>
 
+       * remote-rdp.c: Update copyright.
+       (rdp_init): #if 0 references to "target_byte_order".
+
        * mips-tdep.c (mips_o32_store_return_value): Delete function.
        (mips_o32_return_value): Replace mips_o32_xfer_return_value.
        (mips_o32_extract_return_value): Delete function.
index 6cbf73cbe8a428fa130ff42f78c353fdf7945fa2..2db0a910d83c3de6874306ca3874e1c4e526d325 100644 (file)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* Remote debugging for the ARM RDP interface.
 
-   Copyright 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software
-   Foundation, Inc.
+   Copyright 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free
+   Software Foundation, Inc.
 
    This file is part of GDB.
 
@@ -352,11 +352,29 @@ rdp_init (int cold, int tty)
                  case SERIAL_TIMEOUT:
                    break;
                  case RDP_RES_VALUE_LITTLE_ENDIAN:
+#if 0
+                   /* FIXME: cagney/2003-11-22: Ever since the ARM
+                       was multi-arched (in 2002-02-08), this
+                       assignment has had no effect.  There needs to
+                       be some sort of check/decision based on the
+                       current architecture's byte-order vs the remote
+                       target's byte order.  For the moment disable
+                       the assignment to keep things building.  */
                    target_byte_order = BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE;
+#endif
                    sync = 1;
                    break;
                  case RDP_RES_VALUE_BIG_ENDIAN:
+#if 0
+                   /* FIXME: cagney/2003-11-22: Ever since the ARM
+                       was multi-arched (in 2002-02-08), this
+                       assignment has had no effect.  There needs to
+                       be some sort of check/decision based on the
+                       current architecture's byte-order vs the remote
+                       target's byte order.  For the moment disable
+                       the assignment to keep things building.  */
                    target_byte_order = BFD_ENDIAN_BIG;
+#endif
                    sync = 1;
                    break;
                  default: