+2003-05-07 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+
+ * call.c (build_conditional_expr): Don't assume that the folded
+ expression has result_type.
+
2003-05-06 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
* typeck.c (build_unary_op): Deal with const qualifier in
valid_operands:
result = fold (build (COND_EXPR, result_type, arg1, arg2, arg3));
+ /* We can't use result_type below, as fold might have returned a
+ throw_expr. */
+
/* Expand both sides into the same slot, hopefully the target of the
?: expression. We used to check for TARGET_EXPRs here, but now we
sometimes wrap them in NOP_EXPRs so the test would fail. */
- if (!lvalue_p && IS_AGGR_TYPE (result_type))
- result = build_target_expr_with_type (result, result_type);
+ if (!lvalue_p && IS_AGGR_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (result)))
+ result = get_target_expr (result);
/* If this expression is an rvalue, but might be mistaken for an
lvalue, we must add a NON_LVALUE_EXPR. */
if (!lvalue_p && real_lvalue_p (result))
- result = build1 (NON_LVALUE_EXPR, result_type, result);
+ result = build1 (NON_LVALUE_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (result), result);
return result;
}