Building with clang 11, we get:
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/lm32-tdep.c:84:44: error: overlapping comparisons always evaluate to false [-Werror,-Wtautological-overlap-compare]
return ((regnum >= SIM_LM32_EA_REGNUM) && (regnum <= SIM_LM32_BA_REGNUM))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indeed, this doesn't make sense, as EA_REGNUM is greater than BA_REGNUM.
I'll assume that it was just a mistake and that these two should be
swapped.
The regnums for BA and EA are contiguous, so ultimately this particular
part of the condition is only true if regnum is == EA or == BA. These
registers are Exception Address and Breakpoint Address, so I guess it
makes sense for them to be in the system register group.
The relevant reference is here:
https://www.latticesemi.com/-/media/LatticeSemi/Documents/UserManuals/JL/LatticeMico32ProcessorReferenceManual39.ashx?document_id=52077
gdb/ChangeLog:
* lm32-tdep.c (lm32_register_reggroup_p): Fix condition.
+2020-05-21 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
+
+ * lm32-tdep.c (lm32_register_reggroup_p): Fix condition.
+
2020-05-21 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
* coffread.c (patch_type): Remove NULL check before xfree.
return ((regnum >= SIM_LM32_R0_REGNUM) && (regnum <= SIM_LM32_RA_REGNUM))
|| (regnum == SIM_LM32_PC_REGNUM);
else if (group == system_reggroup)
- return ((regnum >= SIM_LM32_EA_REGNUM) && (regnum <= SIM_LM32_BA_REGNUM))
+ return ((regnum >= SIM_LM32_BA_REGNUM) && (regnum <= SIM_LM32_EA_REGNUM))
|| ((regnum >= SIM_LM32_EID_REGNUM) && (regnum <= SIM_LM32_IP_REGNUM));
return default_register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, group);
}