extend.texi: Update WG14 URL.
authorJoseph Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
Sat, 15 May 2004 10:02:09 +0000 (11:02 +0100)
committerJoseph Myers <jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
Sat, 15 May 2004 10:02:09 +0000 (11:02 +0100)
* doc/extend.texi: Update WG14 URL.

testsuite:
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c: Update WG14 URL.

From-SVN: r81876

gcc/ChangeLog
gcc/doc/extend.texi
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c

index b16217904c435d4045daee5344dd85e9e7d8ed17..808ed608ae97aefeb2426b38db402700f62384aa 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2004-05-15  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+
+       * doc/extend.texi: Update WG14 URL.
+
 2004-05-15  Steven Bosscher  <stevenb@suse.de>
 
        * basic-block.h (life_analysis, delete_noop_moves):
index dbab25c6dfcaf94c072e00e95d5fe0d3e7b8408c..22f5f29efd1ee972e84f55448d866456e394359f 100644 (file)
@@ -5489,7 +5489,7 @@ Similar to @code{__builtin_nan}, except the return type is @code{long double}.
 @deftypefn {Built-in Function} double __builtin_nans (const char *str)
 Similar to @code{__builtin_nan}, except the significand is forced
 to be a signaling NaN.  The @code{nans} function is proposed by
-@uref{http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n965.htm,,WG14 N965}.
+@uref{http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n965.htm,,WG14 N965}.
 @end deftypefn
 
 @deftypefn {Built-in Function} float __builtin_nansf (const char *str)
index d192d2ff1e1651fec70ca168a5d7541b3d4f1505..1a61456a91377e3368a0c9f7437e63f132d69ae8 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2004-05-15  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+
+       * gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c: Update WG14 URL.
+
 2004-05-15  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
 
        PR c/15444
index 4e31eee45637de7c21360059704d30af6606437e..e94a2c8e6dabfb32d98083dc4b1ce6f0d959379a 100644 (file)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* It is not clear whether this test is conforming.  See DR#236
-   http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_236.htm.  However,
+   http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_236.htm.  However,
    there seems to be consensus that the presence of a union to aggregate
    struct s1 and struct s2 should make it conforming.  */
 struct s1 { double d; };