+2004-05-15 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+
+ * doc/extend.texi: Update WG14 URL.
+
2004-05-15 Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
* basic-block.h (life_analysis, delete_noop_moves):
@deftypefn {Built-in Function} double __builtin_nans (const char *str)
Similar to @code{__builtin_nan}, except the significand is forced
to be a signaling NaN. The @code{nans} function is proposed by
-@uref{http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n965.htm,,WG14 N965}.
+@uref{http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n965.htm,,WG14 N965}.
@end deftypefn
@deftypefn {Built-in Function} float __builtin_nansf (const char *str)
+2004-05-15 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
+
+ * gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c: Update WG14 URL.
+
2004-05-15 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
PR c/15444
/* It is not clear whether this test is conforming. See DR#236
- http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_236.htm. However,
+ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_236.htm. However,
there seems to be consensus that the presence of a union to aggregate
struct s1 and struct s2 should make it conforming. */
struct s1 { double d; };