Since r10-7096 convert_like, when called in a template, creates an
IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR when we're converting to/from array type.
In this test, we have e[f], and we're converting f (of type class A) to
int, so convert_like in build_new_op_1 created the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR
that got into cp_build_array_ref which calls maybe_constant_value. My
patch above failed to adjust this spot to call fold_non_dependent_expr
instead, which can handle codes like I_C_E in a template. Fixed by
using a new function maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr, which, if the expr
can't be evaluated to a constant, returns the original expression.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95508
* constexpr.c (maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr): New.
* cp-tree.h (maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr): Declare.
* typeck.c (cp_build_array_ref): Call maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr
instead of maybe_constant_value.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95508
* g++.dg/template/conv16.C: New test.
return maybe_constant_value (t, object, manifestly_const_eval);
}
+/* Like fold_non_dependent_expr, but if EXPR couldn't be folded to a constant,
+ return the original expression. */
+
+tree
+maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr (tree expr,
+ tsubst_flags_t complain/*=tf_warning_or_error*/)
+{
+ tree t = fold_non_dependent_expr (expr, complain);
+ if (t && TREE_CONSTANT (t))
+ return t;
+
+ return expr;
+}
/* Like maybe_constant_init but first fully instantiate the argument. */
extern tree fold_non_dependent_expr (tree,
tsubst_flags_t = tf_warning_or_error,
bool = false, tree = NULL_TREE);
+extern tree maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr (tree,
+ tsubst_flags_t = tf_warning_or_error);
extern tree fold_non_dependent_init (tree,
tsubst_flags_t = tf_warning_or_error,
bool = false);
pointer arithmetic.) */
idx = cp_perform_integral_promotions (idx, complain);
- idx = maybe_constant_value (idx);
+ idx = maybe_fold_non_dependent_expr (idx, complain);
/* An array that is indexed by a non-constant
cannot be stored in a register; we must be able to do
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/95508
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+template <typename>
+struct A;
+template <typename>
+struct B {
+ operator int () { return 0; }
+};
+template <>
+struct A<unsigned> : B<int> {};
+struct D {
+ template <typename>
+ int foo () { return e[f]; }
+ int e[6];
+ A<unsigned> f;
+};