(UNSPEC_DIV_INV_TABLE 37)
(UNSPEC_ASHIFTRT 35)
(UNSPEC_THUNK 36)
+ (UNSPEC_CHKADD 38)
(UNSPEC_SP_SET 40)
(UNSPEC_SP_TEST 41)
(UNSPEC_MOVUA 42)
i++;
}")
+;; op0 = op1 + r12 but hide it before reload completed. See the comment
+;; in symGOT_load expand.
+
+(define_insn_and_split "chk_guard_add"
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
+ (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+ (reg:SI PIC_REG)]
+ UNSPEC_CHKADD))]
+ "TARGET_SH1"
+ "#"
+ "TARGET_SH1 && reload_completed"
+ [(set (match_dup 0) (reg:SI PIC_REG))
+ (set (match_dup 0) (plus:SI (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1)))]
+ ""
+ [(set_attr "type" "arith")])
+
(define_expand "sym_label2reg"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "" "")
(const:SI (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 1 "" "")
else
emit_move_insn (operands[2], operands[1]);
- emit_move_insn (operands[3], gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode,
- operands[2],
- gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, PIC_REG)));
-
/* When stack protector inserts codes after the result is set to
- R0, @(rX, r12) will cause a spill failure for R0. Don't schedule
- insns to avoid combining (set A (plus rX r12)) and (set op0 (mem A))
+ R0, @(rX, r12) will cause a spill failure for R0. Use a unspec
+ insn to avoid combining (set A (plus rX r12)) and (set op0 (mem A))
when rX is a GOT address for the guard symbol. Ugly but doesn't
matter because this is a rare situation. */
if (!TARGET_SHMEDIA
&& GET_CODE (XVECEXP (XEXP (operands[1], 0), 0, 0)) == SYMBOL_REF
&& strcmp (XSTR (XVECEXP (XEXP (operands[1], 0), 0, 0), 0),
\"__stack_chk_guard\") == 0)
- emit_insn (gen_blockage ());
+ emit_insn (gen_chk_guard_add (operands[3], operands[2]));
+ else
+ emit_move_insn (operands[3], gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, operands[2],
+ gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, PIC_REG)));
/* N.B. This is not constant for a GOTPLT relocation. */
mem = gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, operands[3]);