We hit an assertion when loading the binary from PR 26813. When fixing
it, execution goes a up bit further but then hits another assert, and
another, and another. With these fours fixes, I am able to load the
binary and get to the prompt. An error is shown (index pointing outside
of the section), because the DW_FORM_rnglistx attribute is not read
correctly, but that one is taken care of by the next patch.
The four fixes are:
- attribute::form_requires_reprocessing needs to handle forms
DW_FORM_rnglistx and DW_FORM_loclistx, because set_unsigned_reprocess
is called for them in read_attribute_value.
- read_attribute_reprocess must call set_unsigned for them, not
set_address. The parameter of set_address is a CORE_ADDR, meaning
it's for program addresses. Post-reprocess, DW_FORM_rnglistx and
DW_FORM_loclistx are offsets into their respective sections
(.debug_rnglists and .debug_loclists). set_unsigned is the current
attribute value setter that fits the best. But perhaps we should have
a setter that takes a sect_offset?
- read_attribute_process must call as_unsigned_reprocess instead of
as_unsigned to get the pre-reprocess value, otherwise we hit the
assert inside as_unsigned that makes sure the attribute doesn't need
reprocessing.
- attribute::set_unsigned needs to clear the requires_reprocessing flag,
otherwise it stays set when reprocessing DW_FORM_rnglistx and
DW_FORM_loclistx attributes.
There's another assert that we hit once the next patch is applied, but
since it's in the same vein as the changes in this patch, I included it
in this patch:
- attribute::form_is_unsigned must handle form DW_FORM_loclistx,
otherwise we hit the assert when trying to call set_unsigned for an
attribute of this form. DW_FORM_rnglistx is already handled.
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/26813
* dwarf2/attribute.h (struct attribute) <set_unsigned>: Clear
requires_reprocessing flag.
* dwarf2/attribute.c (attribute::form_is_unsigned): Handle
DW_FORM_loclistx.
(attribute::form_requires_reprocessing): Handle DW_FORM_rnglistx
and DW_FORM_loclistx.
* dwarf2/read.c (read_attribute_reprocess): Use set_unsigned
instead of set_address for DW_FORM_loclistx and
DW_FORM_rnglistx.
Change-Id: I06c156fa3913ca98e4e39085f4ef171645b4bc1e
+2021-02-02 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
+
+ PR gdb/26813
+ * dwarf2/attribute.h (struct attribute) <set_unsigned>: Clear
+ requires_reprocessing flag.
+ * dwarf2/attribute.c (attribute::form_is_unsigned): Handle
+ DW_FORM_loclistx.
+ (attribute::form_requires_reprocessing): Handle DW_FORM_rnglistx
+ and DW_FORM_loclistx.
+ * dwarf2/read.c (read_attribute_reprocess): Use set_unsigned
+ instead of set_address for DW_FORM_loclistx and
+ DW_FORM_rnglistx.
+
2021-02-02 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
* dwarf2/read.c (read_loclist_index): Remove bound check for
|| form == DW_FORM_flag_present
|| form == DW_FORM_udata
|| form == DW_FORM_rnglistx
+ || form == DW_FORM_loclistx
|| form == DW_FORM_ref1
|| form == DW_FORM_ref2
|| form == DW_FORM_ref4
|| form == DW_FORM_strx4
|| form == DW_FORM_GNU_str_index
|| form == DW_FORM_addrx
- || form == DW_FORM_GNU_addr_index);
+ || form == DW_FORM_GNU_addr_index
+ || form == DW_FORM_rnglistx
+ || form == DW_FORM_loclistx);
}
/* See attribute.h. */
{
gdb_assert (form_is_unsigned ());
u.unsnd = unsnd;
+ requires_reprocessing = 0;
}
/* Temporarily set this attribute to an unsigned integer. This is
attr->as_unsigned_reprocess ()));
break;
case DW_FORM_loclistx:
- attr->set_address (read_loclist_index (cu, attr->as_unsigned ()));
- break;
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR loclists_sect_off
+ = read_loclist_index (cu, attr->as_unsigned_reprocess ());
+
+ attr->set_unsigned (loclists_sect_off);
+ }
+ break;
case DW_FORM_rnglistx:
- attr->set_address (read_rnglist_index (cu, attr->as_unsigned (), tag));
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR rnglists_sect_off
+ = read_rnglist_index (cu, attr->as_unsigned_reprocess (), tag);
+
+ attr->set_unsigned (rnglists_sect_off);
+ }
break;
case DW_FORM_strx:
case DW_FORM_strx1: