This patch almost a decade ago:
...
2007-08-31 Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>
* cp-demangle.c (d_dump): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_RVALUE_REFERENCE.
(d_make_comp): Ditto.
...
... missed doing the same change to cplus_demangle_fill_component that
was done to d_make_comp. I.e., teach it to only validate that we're
not passing in a "right" subtree. GDB has recently (finally) learned
about rvalue references, and a change to make it use
cplus_demangle_fill_component more ran into an assertion because of
this.
(GDB is the only user of cplus_demangle_fill_component in both the gcc
and binutils-gdb trees.)
libiberty/ChangeLog:
2017-03-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* cp-demint.c (cplus_demangle_fill_component): Handle
DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_RVALUE_REFERENCE.
+2017-03-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
+
+ * cp-demint.c (cplus_demangle_fill_component): Handle
+ DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_RVALUE_REFERENCE.
+
2017-03-12 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
* cp-demangle.c (cplus_demangle_fill_name): Initialize
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CONST_THIS:
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_POINTER:
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_REFERENCE:
+ case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_RVALUE_REFERENCE:
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_COMPLEX:
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_IMAGINARY:
case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_VENDOR_TYPE: