Currently, we allow new char[]{"foo"}, but not new char[4]{"foo"}.
We should accept the latter too: [dcl.init.list]p3.3 says to treat
this as [dcl.init.string].
We were rejecting this code because we never called reshape_init before
the digest_init in build_new_1. reshape_init handles [dcl.init.string]
by unwrapping the STRING_CST from its enclosing { }, and digest_init
assumes that reshape_init has been called for aggregates anyway, and an
array is an aggregate.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/77841
* init.c (build_new_1): Call reshape_init.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/77841
* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-new4.C: New test.
/* We'll check the length at runtime. */
domain = NULL_TREE;
arraytype = build_cplus_array_type (type, domain);
+ /* If we have new char[4]{"foo"}, we have to reshape
+ so that the STRING_CST isn't wrapped in { }. */
+ vecinit = reshape_init (arraytype, vecinit, complain);
+ /* The middle end doesn't cope with the location wrapper
+ around a STRING_CST. */
+ STRIP_ANY_LOCATION_WRAPPER (vecinit);
vecinit = digest_init (arraytype, vecinit, complain);
}
}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/77841
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+char *p1 = new char[4]{"foo"};
+char *p2 = new char[5]{"foo"};
+char *p3 = new char[3]{"foo"}; // { dg-error "too long" }