Most of the VEC4 back-end agrees on src_reg::swizzle being one of the
BRW_SWIZZLE macros defined in brw_reg.h, except in two places where we
use Mesa's SWIZZLE macros. There is even a doxygen comment saying
that Mesa's macros are the right ones. They are incompatible swizzle
representations (3 bits vs. 2 bits per component), and the code using
Mesa's works by pure luck. Fix it.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <stereotype441@gmail.com>
if (type && (type->is_scalar() || type->is_vector() || type->is_matrix()))
this->swizzle = swizzle_for_size(type->vector_elements);
else
- this->swizzle = SWIZZLE_XYZW;
+ this->swizzle = BRW_SWIZZLE_XYZW;
}
/** Generic unset register constructor. */
explicit src_reg(dst_reg reg);
- GLuint swizzle; /**< SWIZZLE_XYZW swizzles from Mesa. */
+ GLuint swizzle; /**< BRW_SWIZZLE_XYZW macros from brw_reg.h. */
bool negate;
bool abs;
/* Give the write-channels of dst the form:
* 0xhhhh0000
*/
- tmp_src.swizzle = SWIZZLE_Y;
+ tmp_src.swizzle = BRW_SWIZZLE_YYYY;
emit(SHL(dst, tmp_src, src_reg(16u)));
/* Finally, give the write-channels of dst the form of packHalf2x16's
* output:
* 0xhhhhllll
*/
- tmp_src.swizzle = SWIZZLE_X;
+ tmp_src.swizzle = BRW_SWIZZLE_XXXX;
emit(OR(dst, src_reg(dst), tmp_src));
}