GCC revision 267634 implemented two_value_replacement function.
However, a typo occurred during the parameter check, which caused
us to miss some optimizations.
The intent of the code might be to check that the input parameters
are const int and their difference is one. However, when I read
the code, I found that it is wrong to detect whether an input data
plus one is equal to itself. This could be a typo.
2019-05-07 Li Jia He <helijia@linux.ibm.com>
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (two_value_replacement): Fix a typo in parameter
detection.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr37508.c: Add the no-ssa-phiopt option to skip phi
optimization.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c: New testcase.
From-SVN: r270934
+2019-05-07 Li Jia He <helijia@linux.ibm.com>
+
+ * tree-ssa-phiopt.c (two_value_replacement): Fix a typo in parameter
+ detection.
+
2019-05-06 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (FIRST_ALTIVEC_REGNO, LAST_ALTIVEC_REGNO)
+2019-05-07 Li Jia He <helijia@linux.ibm.com>
+
+ * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr37508.c: Add the no-ssa-phiopt option to skip phi
+ optimization.
+ * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88676-2.c: New testcase.
+
2019-05-06 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/90290
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-vrp1" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-ssa-phiopt -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-vrp1" } */
struct foo1 {
int i:1;
{
if (x->i == 0)
return 1;
- else if (x->i == -1) /* This test is already folded to false by ccp1. */
+ else if (x->i == -1) /* This test is already optimized by ccp1 or phiopt1. */
return 1;
return 0;
}
{
if (x->i == 0)
return 1;
- else if (x->i == 1) /* This test is already folded to false by fold. */
+ else if (x->i == 1) /* This test is already optimized by ccp1 or phiopt1. */
return 1;
return 0;
}
--- /dev/null
+/* PR tree-optimization/88676 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-phiopt1" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = PHI <" "phiopt1" } } */
+
+struct foo1 {
+ int i:1;
+};
+struct foo2 {
+ unsigned i:1;
+};
+
+int test1 (struct foo1 *x)
+{
+ if (x->i == 0)
+ return 1;
+ else if (x->i == 1)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int test2 (struct foo2 *x)
+{
+ if (x->i == 0)
+ return 1;
+ else if (x->i == -1)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
|| TREE_CODE (arg1) != INTEGER_CST
|| (tree_int_cst_lt (arg0, arg1)
? wi::to_widest (arg0) + 1 != wi::to_widest (arg1)
- : wi::to_widest (arg1) + 1 != wi::to_widest (arg1)))
+ : wi::to_widest (arg1) + 1 != wi::to_widest (arg0)))
return false;
if (!empty_block_p (middle_bb))