/** True if last committed microop can be followed by an interrupt */
bool canHandleInterrupts;
+ /** Have we had an interrupt pending and then seen it de-asserted because
+ of a masking change? In this case the variable is set and the next time
+ interrupts are enabled and pending the pipeline will squash to avoid
+ a possible livelock senario. */
+ bool avoidQuiesceLiveLock;
+
/** Updates commit stats based on this instruction. */
void updateComInstStats(DynInstPtr &inst);
numThreads(params->numThreads),
drainPending(false),
trapLatency(params->trapLatency),
- canHandleInterrupts(true)
+ canHandleInterrupts(true),
+ avoidQuiesceLiveLock(false)
{
_status = Active;
_nextStatus = Inactive;
"it got handled. Restart fetching from the orig path.\n");
toIEW->commitInfo[0].clearInterrupt = true;
interrupt = NoFault;
+ avoidQuiesceLiveLock = true;
return;
}
generateTrapEvent(0);
interrupt = NoFault;
+ avoidQuiesceLiveLock = false;
} else {
DPRINTF(Commit, "Interrupt pending: instruction is %sin "
"flight, ROB is %sempty\n",
"PC skip function event, stopping commit\n");
break;
}
+
+ // Check if an instruction just enabled interrupts and we've
+ // previously had an interrupt pending that was not handled
+ // because interrupts were subsequently disabled before the
+ // pipeline reached a place to handle the interrupt. In that
+ // case squash now to make sure the interrupt is handled.
+ //
+ // If we don't do this, we might end up in a live lock situation
+ if (!interrupt && avoidQuiesceLiveLock &&
+ (!head_inst->isMicroop() || head_inst->isLastMicroop()) &&
+ cpu->checkInterrupts(cpu->tcBase(0)))
+ squashAfter(tid, head_inst);
} else {
DPRINTF(Commit, "Unable to commit head instruction PC:%s "
"[tid:%i] [sn:%i].\n",