DR 1423, which supersedes DR 654, says that you can't copy-init
a bool from a std::nullptr_t:
bool b = nullptr; // error
Conversely, it works with direct-initialization which is more
permissive than copy-initialization.
No code changes necessary since we handle it right.
2020-02-26 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
DR 1423, Convertibility of nullptr to bool.
* g++.dg/DRs/dr1423.C: New test.
+2020-02-26 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
+
+ DR 1423, Convertibility of nullptr to bool.
+ * g++.dg/DRs/dr1423.C: New test.
+
2020-02-26 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/93803 - ICE with constexpr init and [[no_unique_address]].
--- /dev/null
+// DR 1423 - Convertibility of nullptr to bool.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+bool b = nullptr; // { dg-error "converting to .bool. from .std::nullptr_t. requires direct-initialization" }
+bool b2(nullptr);
+bool b3{nullptr};
+bool b4 = { nullptr }; // { dg-error "converting to .bool. from .std::nullptr_t. requires direct-initialization" }