The following testcase ICEs, because the PR84305 changes try to evaluate
the size earlier. If size has side-effects, that is desirable, and the
side-effects will actually be wrapped in a SAVE_EXPR. The problem on this
testcase is that there are no side-effects, and c_fully_fold doesn't fold
those COMPOUND_EXPRs to constant, and while before gimplification we unshare
trees found in the expressions, the unsharing doesn't involve TYPE_SIZE etc.
of used types. Gimplification is destructive though, so when we gimplify
the two nested COMPOUND_EXPRs and then try to gimplify it the second time
for the TYPE_SIZEs, we ICE.
Now, we could use unshare_expr in what we push to *expr, SAVE_EXPRs and
their operands in there aren't unshared, but I really don't see a point of
evaluating expressions that don't have side-effects before, so instead
this just pushes there expressions that do have side-effects.
2020-02-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/93576
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If this_size_varies, only push size into
*expr if it has side effects.
* gcc.dg/pr93576.c: New test.
+2020-02-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c/93576
+ * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If this_size_varies, only push size into
+ *expr if it has side effects.
+
2020-01-30 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
PR c/88660
}
if (this_size_varies)
{
- if (*expr)
- *expr = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (size),
- *expr, size);
- else
- *expr = size;
+ if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (size))
+ {
+ if (*expr)
+ *expr = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (size),
+ *expr, size);
+ else
+ *expr = size;
+ }
*expr_const_operands &= size_maybe_const;
}
}
+2020-02-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c/93576
+ * gcc.dg/pr93576.c: New test.
+
2020-02-13 Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-static13.C:
--- /dev/null
+/* PR c/93576 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ int b[] = { 0 };
+ (char (*)[(1, 7, 2)]) 0;
+}