+2017-01-27 Adam Butcher <adam@jessamine.co.uk>
+
+ PR c++/64382
+ * cp/parser.c (parsing_default_capturing_generic_lambda_in_template):
+ New function.
+ * cp/cp-tree.h: Declare it.
+ * cp/semantics.c (finish_id_expression): Resolve names within a default
+ capturing generic lambda defined within a template prior to
+ instantiation to allow for captures to be added to the closure type.
+
2017-01-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/68727
/* In parser.c */
extern tree cp_convert_range_for (tree, tree, tree, tree, unsigned int, bool);
extern bool parsing_nsdmi (void);
+extern bool parsing_default_capturing_generic_lambda_in_template (void);
extern void inject_this_parameter (tree, cp_cv_quals);
/* in pt.c */
return false;
}
+/* Return true iff our current scope is a default capturing generic lambda
+ defined within a template. FIXME: This is part of a workaround (see
+ semantics.c) to handle building lambda closure types correctly in templates
+ which we ultimately want to defer to instantiation time. */
+
+bool
+parsing_default_capturing_generic_lambda_in_template (void)
+{
+ if (!processing_template_decl || !current_class_type)
+ return false;
+
+ tree lam = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (current_class_type);
+ if (!lam || LAMBDA_EXPR_DEFAULT_CAPTURE_MODE (lam) == CPLD_NONE)
+ return false;
+
+ tree callop = lambda_function (lam);
+ if (!callop)
+ return false;
+
+ return (DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (callop)
+ && (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (callop)) == callop)
+ && ((current_nonlambda_class_type ()
+ && CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (current_nonlambda_class_type ()))
+ || ((current_nonlambda_function ()
+ && DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (current_nonlambda_function ())))));
+}
+
/* Parse a late-specified return type, if any. This is not a separate
non-terminal, but part of a function declarator, which looks like
? CP_ID_KIND_UNQUALIFIED_DEPENDENT
: CP_ID_KIND_UNQUALIFIED)));
- /* If the name was dependent on a template parameter, we will
- resolve the name at instantiation time. */
- if (dependent_p)
+ /* If the name was dependent on a template parameter and we're not in a
+ default capturing generic lambda within a template, we will resolve the
+ name at instantiation time. FIXME: For lambdas, we should defer
+ building the closure type until instantiation time then we won't need
+ the extra test here. */
+ if (dependent_p
+ && !parsing_default_capturing_generic_lambda_in_template ())
{
if (DECL_P (decl)
&& any_dependent_type_attributes_p (DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl)))
+2017-01-27 Adam Butcher <adam@jessamine.co.uk>
+
+ PR c++/64382
+ * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr64382.C: New test.
+
2017-01-26 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/78703
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/64382
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+template<typename T>
+struct my_queue
+{
+ void push(T)
+ {
+ }
+ void ice()
+ {
+ auto L = [=](auto &&v) {
+ push(v);
+ };
+ trav(L);
+ }
+ template<typename F>
+ void trav(F &&f)
+ {
+ f(T());
+ }
+};
+template struct my_queue<int>;