+2014-11-10 Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrumyan@gmail.com>
+
+ * tree-if-conv.c (add_to_predicate_list): Check unconditionally
+ that bb is always executed to early exit. Use predicate of
+ cd-equivalent block for join blocks if it exists.
+ (if_convertible_loop_p_1): Recompute POST_DOMINATOR tree.
+ (tree_if_conversion): Free post-dominance information.
+
2014-11-09 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* config/i386/avx512vldqintrin.h (_mm256_broadcast_f32x2): __mmask8.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-ifcvt-details -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores" } */
+
+void foo (int *x1, int *x2, int *x3, int *x4, int *y)
+{
+ int i;
+ int a1, a2, a3, b1, b2;
+
+ for (i=0; i<128; i++)
+ {
+ a1 = x1[i];
+ a2 = x2[i];
+ a3 = x3[i];
+ y[i] = 0;
+ if (x4[i] == 0)
+ {
+ b1 = a1 + 1;
+ if (a2 > 0)
+ b1++;
+ a1++;
+ if (a3 < 0)
+ b1--;
+ y[i] = b1;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Use predicate of bb" 8 "ifcvt" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "ifcvt" } } */
}
/* Add condition NC to the predicate list of basic block BB. LOOP is
- the loop to be if-converted. */
+ the loop to be if-converted. Use predicate of cd-equivalent block
+ for join bb if it exists: we call basic blocks bb1 and bb2
+ cd-equivalent if they are executed under the same condition. */
static inline void
add_to_predicate_list (struct loop *loop, basic_block bb, tree nc)
{
tree bc, *tp;
+ basic_block dom_bb;
if (is_true_predicate (nc))
return;
- if (!is_predicated (bb))
- {
- /* If dominance tells us this basic block is always executed, don't
- record any predicates for it. */
- if (dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, bb))
- return;
+ /* If dominance tells us this basic block is always executed,
+ don't record any predicates for it. */
+ if (dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, bb))
+ return;
- bc = nc;
+ dom_bb = get_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb);
+ /* We use notion of cd equivalence to get simpler predicate for
+ join block, e.g. if join block has 2 predecessors with predicates
+ p1 & p2 and p1 & !p2, we'd like to get p1 for it instead of
+ p1 & p2 | p1 & !p2. */
+ if (dom_bb != loop->header
+ && get_immediate_dominator (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, dom_bb) == bb)
+ {
+ gcc_assert (flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, dom_bb));
+ bc = bb_predicate (dom_bb);
+ gcc_assert (!is_true_predicate (bc));
+ set_bb_predicate (bb, bc);
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ fprintf (dump_file, "Use predicate of bb#%d for bb#%d\n",
+ dom_bb->index, bb->index);
+ return;
}
+
+ if (!is_predicated (bb))
+ bc = nc;
else
{
bc = bb_predicate (bb);
return false;
calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+ calculate_dominance_info (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS);
/* Allow statements that can be handled during if-conversion. */
ifc_bbs = get_loop_body_in_if_conv_order (loop);
free (ifc_bbs);
ifc_bbs = NULL;
}
+ free_dominance_info (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS);
return todo;
}