One possibility is that the 11 bits are used for bank selection, with
some room for additional context such as altering the registers used
-for the 16 bit operations (bank selection of which scalar regs)
-
-Another is to use the 11 bits for only the utmost commonly used
-instructions. That being the case then even one of those 11 bits would
-also need to be dedicated to saying if 16 bit mode is to be continued.
-10 bits remain for actual opcodes, which is ridiculously tight.
+for the 16 bit operations (bank selection of which scalar regs).
+However the downside is that short sequences of Compressed instructions
+become penalised by the fixed overhead. Even a single 16 bit instruction requires a 16 bit overhead to "gain access" to 16 bit "mode", making the exercise pointless.
+
+An alternative is to use the first 11 bits for only the utmost commonly used
+instructions. That being the case then one of those 11 bits could
+be dedicated to saying if 16 bit mode is to be continued, at which
+point *all* 16 bits can be used for Compressed.
+10 bits remain for actual opcodes, which is ridiculously tight,
+however the opportunity to subsequently use all 16 bits is worth it.
The reason for picking 2 contiguous Major v3.0B opcodes is illustrated below: