the hugely detrimental effect it has on parallel processing, XER.SO is
**ignored** completely and is **not** brought into play here. The CR
overflow bit is therefore simply set to zero if saturation did not occur,
-and to one if it did.
+and to one if it did. This behaviour (ignoring XER.SO) is actually optional in
+the SFFS Compliancy Subset: for SVP64 it is made mandatory *but only on
+Vectorised instructions*.
Note also that saturate on operations that set OE=1 must raise an Illegal
Instruction due to the conflicting use of the CR.so bit for storing if
-saturation occurred. Integer Operations that produce a Carry-Out (CA,
+saturation occurred. Vectorised Integer Operations that produce a Carry-Out (CA,
CA32): these two bits will be `UNDEFINED` if saturation is also requested.
Note that the operation takes place at the maximum bitwidth (max of
given element hit saturation may be done using a mapreduced CR op (cror),
or by using the new crrweird instruction with Rc=1, which will transfer
the required CR bits to a scalar integer and update CR0, which will allow
-testing the scalar integer for nonzero. see [[sv/cr_int_predication]]*
+testing the scalar integer for nonzero. see [[sv/cr_int_predication]].
+Alternatively, a Data-Dependent Fail-First may be used to truncate the
+Vector Length to non-saturated elements, greatly increasing the productivity
+of parallelised inner hot-loops.*
## Reduce mode