i965: Fix border color on Sandybridge and Ivybridge.
authorKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:33:40 +0000 (03:33 -0800)
committerKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:38:14 +0000 (10:38 -0800)
While reading through the simulator, I found some interesting code that
looks like it checks the sampler default color pointer against the bound
set in STATE_BASE_ADDRESS.  On failure, it appears to program it to the
base address itself.

So I decided to try programming a legitimate bound, and lo and behold,
border color worked.

+92 piglits on Sandybridge.  Also fixes Lightsmark on Ivybridge.

NOTE: This is a candidate for stable release branches.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28924
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38868
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_misc_state.c

index 8e59a472bacbd51885023abdaff04df11cfd7ebf..1a7d32824729a5d2b8d8ee1cff577ec34849d896 100644 (file)
@@ -769,7 +769,13 @@ static void upload_state_base_address( struct brw_context *brw )
                 1); /* Instruction base address: shader kernels (incl. SIP) */
 
        OUT_BATCH(1); /* General state upper bound */
-       OUT_BATCH(1); /* Dynamic state upper bound */
+       /* Dynamic state upper bound.  Although the documentation says that
+       * programming it to zero will cause it to be ignored, that is a lie.
+       * If this isn't programmed to a real bound, the sampler border color
+       * pointer is rejected, causing border color to mysteriously fail.
+       */
+       OUT_RELOC(intel->batch.bo, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION, 0,
+                intel->batch.bo->size | 1);
        OUT_BATCH(1); /* Indirect object upper bound */
        OUT_BATCH(1); /* Instruction access upper bound */
        ADVANCE_BATCH();